Page 162 - ELT_1_1st April 2020_Vol 372_Part
P. 162

48                          EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372

                                                 i.  Refund matters (including rebate), shall be adjudicated by the
                                            Deputy Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner without any monetary
                                            limit.
                                                 ii.  In case different show cause notices have been issued on the same
                                            issue answerable to different adjudicating authorities, Show Cause Notices
                                            involving the same issue shall be adjudicated by the adjudicating authority
                                            competent to decide the case involving the highest amount of duty.”
                                            4.  The facts of the case, necessary for deciding present controversy lie
                                     in a narrow  compass. A show cause  notice CNo. DZU/INV/CE/G/49/2013/
                                     1550, dated 1-3-2016 was issued by the Additional Director General, Directorate
                                     General of Central Excise Intelligence, Delhi Zonal Unit, New  Delhi (for  short
                                     ‘the DGCEI’) to M/s. Chandra Protech Ltd., Silvassa for denial and recovery of
                                     Cenvat Credit of Rs. 22,45,79,860/- along with interest besides invocation of pe-
                                     nal provisions. This show cause notice was made answerable to the Additional
                                     Director General (Adjudication), DGCEI, Delhi Zonal Unit, Delhi. Another show
                                     cause notice, pursuant to which impugned Order-in-Original was passed, was
                                     issued to the petitioners herein vide CNo. V(H)Adj/CE-74/Alw/132/2017, dat-
                                     ed 2-5-2017 by the Commissioner, Central Excise and Service Tax Commissioner-
                                     ate, Alwar for denial and recovery of Cenvat credit of Rs. 12,86,71,912/- along
                                     with interest besides invocation of penal provisions. Perusal of aforesaid two
                                     show cause  notices would indicate that show cause notice dated 2-5-2017 has
                                     been issued  on the basis  of investigation conducted and referred to in earlier
                                     show cause notice dated 1-3-2016 issued to M/s. Chandra Protech Ltd., Silvassa.
                                            5.  We have been taken through both  the show cause notices and we
                                     find that averments of both the show cause notices are having striking similari-
                                     ties at different pages and their contents are verbatim at several places. Similari-
                                     ties in two show cause notices dated 1-3-2016 and 2-5-2017 are listed as under :

                                              S.   Description   Para & Page no. of show   Para & Page no. of
                                             No.                  cause notice dated    show cause notice
                                                                    1-3-2016 (P-3),    dated 2-5-2017 (P-4),
                                                                    Page 91 to 156      Page 157 to 181
                                              1.                                     Para 2, page 157, show
                                                                                     cause notice dated 2-3-
                                                                                     2016 (actual  date 1-3-
                                                                                     2016 - P-3) refers
                                              2. Panchnama     Para 2.4.2,  page 112, 113.  Para 10,  page 160,  161.
                                                 dated 9-4-2013  At  page 113 “…… . Then  At page 161 “…. . Then
                                                 drawn at prem- we reached the destination  we reached the destina-
                                                 ises of M/s.  and……. . but no  person  tion and…. . but no
                                                 Sypher Impex   was available there…… .”  person was  available
                                                                                     there....”
                                             2.1      Do       Ist para at  page 114 “…. .  Para 10.1 at  page 161
                                                               On going through the con- “…. . On going through
                                                               tents of the above….  . no  the contents of the
                                                               production  had  taken above….. . No produc-
                                                               place in the said factory   tion had taken place in
                                                                                     the said factory

                                                          EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st April 2020      210
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167