Page 257 - ELT_1_1st April 2020_Vol 372_Part
P. 257

2020 ]  COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE v. TILE ITALIA MOSAICS PVT. LTD.  143

                              2020 (372) E.L.T. 143 (Tri. - Bang.)
                        IN THE CESTAT, SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, BANGALORE
                     S/Shri S.S. Garg, Member (J) and P. Anjani Kumar, Member (T)
                        COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE
                                                Versus
                                TILE ITALIA MOSAICS PVT. LTD.
                   Final Order No. 20949/2018, dated 9-7-2018 in Appeal No. C/485/2007-DB
                                                                                   1
                       Tiles - Anti-dumping duty  on polished porcelain/vitrified floor tiles
               imported from Sri Lanka - Sri Lankan supplier importing semi-finished tiles
               from China and after polishing and sizing thereof exporting to India - Such
               tiles considered to have originated from Sri Lanka and not from China and not
               liable to Anti-dumping duty under Notification No. 73/2003-Cus. [paras 2, 4]
                                                                       Appeal dismissed
                                             CASE CITED
               Tile Italia Mosaics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner — 2007 (208) E.L.T. 437 (Tribunal)
                    — Followed ................................................................................................................................... [Paras 4, 5]
                       REPRESENTED BY :     Dr. J. Harish, Dy. Commissioner (AR), for the Ap-
                                            pellant.
                       [Order per : S.S. Garg, Member (J)]. - The presant appeal has been filed
               by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 31-5-2007 passed by the
               Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the
               Order-in-Original No. 150/2006-3C, dated 20-9-2006.
                       2.  Briefly the facts at the present case are that the respendents imported
               two consignments of polished Porcelain/Vitrified Floor tiles of size 600x600 mm,
               10mm thickness supplied by M/s. Sprint Tiles Exports (Pvt.) Ltd. (the supplier),
               Colombo, Sri Lanka, and filed two Bills of Entry No. 114152, dated 19-1-2006 and
               No. 115854, dated 17-2-2006, which was supported by the suppliers commercial
               invoice/packing list  and  also the certificate of origin issued by The Ceylon
               Chambers of Commerce, Colombo. The respondents sought classification of the
               goods under CTH 6907 90 10. They cleared the goods on payment of duties of
               Customs. The Sri Lankan Customs vide their letter dated 22-12-2004 confirmed to
               the Deputy Director, DRI, Chennai that the supplier imports the semi-finished
               tiles from the Peoples Republic of China (China for short), thereupon the semi-
               finished tiles are processed for polishing and sizing at the supplier’s premises in
               Sri Lanka and that the tiles so imported by the supplier are rightly classifiable
               under 6907 90 90 of HSN and not under 6904 90 09 of HSN as entered by them
               and that they do not import raw materials for manufacture of Porcelain tiles, but
               simply import semi-finished tiles which has the essential character of a finished
               tile for classification purpose. The Department issued a show cause notice  for
               finally assessing the Bill of Entry demanding differential duty denying the bene-
               fit  of Notification  No. 72/2005-Cus., dated 22-7-2005 and also demanding  the
               anti-dumping duty under Notification No. 73/2003-Cus. dated 1-5-2003 as it ap-
               peared that the impugned goods were originated in China and not in Sri Lanka
               ________________________________________________________________________
               1    In appeal against this order, notice was issued  by Supreme Court in 2020 (372) E.L.T. A29
                    (S.C.).
                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st April 2020      305
   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262