Page 306 - ELT_1_1st April 2020_Vol 372_Part
P. 306

192                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372

                                            24.  In view of the above observations, we pass the following order :-
                                            (i)  The  activity undertaken by  M/s. GM amounts  to manufacture.
                                                 Therefore, the impugned  order  quo demand of duty against  M/s.
                                                 GM is not sustainable and the impugned order is set aside. Conse-
                                                 quently, the appeals filed by M/s. GM and M/s. GMI are allowed.
                                            (ii) Appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed.
                                                    (Order pronounced in the Court on 17-10-2017)
                                                                     _______

                                     Corrigendum to 2005 (189) E.L.T. 88 (Tri. - Mumbai)
                                            There is misprint in the Headnote reported in 2005 (189) E.L.T. 88 (Tri. -
                                     Mumbai) (Goenka Industries v.  Commissioner), regarding the Members name in
                                     Headnote as published in Vol. 189, Page No. 88 of Excise Law Times. According-
                                     ly the Members name in the Headnote as appearing in fifth and sixth line, same
                                     may be corrected as follows :
                                       “Majority per : Smt. Archana Wadhwa, Member (J) and Shri Moheb Ali M.,
                                                                   Member (T)”
                                            Readers are advised to make appropriate corrections in their copy. In-
                                     convenience caused to you due to this misprint, is deeply regretted.
                                                                     _______

                                     Corrigendum to 2020 (371) E.L.T. 823 (S.C.)
                                            The Hon’ble Supreme Court on 25-2-2020 in No. F. 3/Ed. B.J./3/2020 is-
                                     sued the following corrigendum in the case of Nola Ram Dulichand Dal Mills v.
                                     Union of India reported in 2020 (371) E.L.T. 823 (S.C.) :
                                        Sl. No.     Page No.                     Description
                                          1.            1 9      Entire para No. 14 deleted
                                          2.            2 9      Para No. 15 re-numbered as Para No. 14
                                          3.           3 10      Para No. 16 re-numbered as Para No. 15
                                          4.           4 10      Para No. 17 re-numbered as Para No. 16
                                          5.           5 10      Para No. 18 re-numbered as Para No. 17
                                          6.           6 11      Para No. 19 re-numbered as Para No. 18
                                            The Headnote reported in 2020 (371) E.L.T. 823 (S.C.), the Paras Number
                                     may be corrected as under :
                                            (i)  In line 42 at page 823 [Paras 12, 13, 14] replace with [paras 12, 13]
                                            (ii)  In line 8 at page 824 [para 15] replace with [para 14].

                                            Readers are advised to make suitable correction.
                                                                     _______
                                     ________________________________________________________________________
                                     1    Deleted Paragraph No. 14 at page 828 of 2020 (371) E.L.T. 823 (S.C.).
                                     2    Corrected at page 828 in line 13 of Paragraph No. 15 of 2020 (371) E.L.T. 823 (S.C.).
                                     3    Corrected at page 828 in line 22 of Paragraph No. 16 of 2020 (371) E.L.T. 823 (S.C.).
                                     4    Corrected at page 828 in line 25 of Paragraph No. 17 of 2020 (371) E.L.T. 823 (S.C.).
                                     5    Corrected at page 828 in line 29 of Paragraph No. 18 of 2020 (371) E.L.T. 823 (S.C.).
                                     6    Corrected at page 828 in line 44 of Paragraph No. 19 of 2020 (371) E.L.T. 823 (S.C.).
                                                          EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st April 2020      354
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308