Page 187 - ELT_1st June 2020_VOL 372_Part 5th
P. 187

2020 ]  JOY’S THE BEACH RESORT PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CHENNAI   721

                             2020 (372) E.L.T. 721 (Tri. - Chennai)
                         IN THE CESTAT, SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI
                                           [COURT NO. III]
                 Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (J) and Shri C.J. Mathew, Member (T)
                             JOY’S THE BEACH RESORT PVT. LTD.
                                                Versus
                          COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CHENNAI
                  Final Order Nos. 40106-40107/2020, dated 6-2-2020 in Appeal Nos. C/40486-
                                             40487/2013-DB
                       Cars - EPCG Scheme for import of luxury cars - Conditions - Violation
               thereof - Appellants although register the car imported as private vehicle ini-
               tially but converted the registration to tourist vehicle much before issuance of
               Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC) - As long as foreign exchange
               is earned by the hotel and imported car used for hotel purpose, there would be
               no violation of any statutory requirement and it is not necessary that the for-
               eign exchange has to be exclusively earned by using the vehicle - Therefore,
               use by Directors or use other than ferrying tourists not breach of the condi-
               tions of exemption - Appellant having been issued EODC on 12-6-2018 by the
               Jt. DGFT, Trivandrum, department cannot proceed to recover the duty forgone
               at the time of import, alleging non-fulfilment of conditions of EPCG license -
               Demand not sustainable - Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962. [paras 8, 9, 10, 11]
                                                                        Appeals allowed
                                             CASES CITED
               Commissioner v. Air Travel Bureau Ltd. — 2010 (260) E.L.T. 78 (Del.) — Relied on ........... [Paras 4, 9, 11]
               Commissioner v. Hotel Excelsior Ltd. — 2016 (336) E.L.T. 595 (Del.) — Relied on .................. [Paras 9, 11]
               Hotel Excelsior Ltd. v. Commissioner — 2016 (336) E.L.T. 116 (Tribunal) — Referred ................... [Para 4]
               Narang International Hotels Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner
                     — 2017 (347) E.L.T. 680 (Tribunal) — Relied on ........................................................... [Paras 4, 10, 11]
                               DEPARTMENTAL CLARIFICATION CITED
               D.G.F.T. Policy Circular No. 7/(RE-08)/2004-09, dated 7-5-2008 ................................................ [Paras 3, 7]
                       REPRESENTED BY :     Shri Hari Radhakrishnan, Advocate, for the
                                            Appellant.
                                            Ms. T. Usha Devi, DC (AR), for the Respondent.
                       [Order per : Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (J)]. - Brief facts are that the
               appellants M/s. Joy’s The Beach Resort Pvt. Ltd. imported one Mercedez Benz
               car vide Bill of Entry dated 10-2-2006 availing concessional rate of duty under
               Notification No. 97/2004, dated 17-9-2004 using EPCG license dated 23-12-2005
               issued by Jt. D.G.F.T., Trivandrum. On specific intelligence that the vehicle is
               used in violation of the conditions stipulated in the license, investigations were
               initiated. It was noticed that the vehicle was not registered as a tourist taxi and
               was registered only as a private vehicle in the name of the Managing Director of
               the appellant-company. The vehicle was initially seized and thereafter provision-
               ally released on furnishing bank guarantee. Show Cause Notice was issued alleg-
               ing violation of the conditions in the E.P.C.G. license and for recovery of duty
               forgone along with interest and also for imposing penalty. After due process of
                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st June 2020      187
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192