Page 20 - ELT_1st June 2020_VOL 372_Part 5th
P. 20

xviii                       EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372
                                     Interpretation of statutes  - Beneficial fiscal statute - It is to be liberally
                                        construed - Tax benefits, conditional to obligations to be fulfilled by
                                        beneficiary, have to  be construed to advance benefit,  rather than deny
                                        same — Union of India v. E.I. Dupoint India (Del.) .................... 625
                                     — Shall - It denotes mandate - It is not inevitably regarded as mandatory
                                        and Court is guided by real intention of Legislature — Union of India v. E.I.
                                        Dupoint India (Del.) ................................... 625
                                     Investigation  under Wild  Life (Protection) Act, 1972, inter alia, by DRI,
                                        scope of - See under SEARCH AND SEIZURE .................. 673
                                     Limitation for  filing revision application  - See under REVISION
                                        APPLICATION ................................... 740
                                     Mandatory nature  of time-limit for issuing Show Cause  Notice for
                                        revocation of Customs Broker Licence - See under CUSTOMS BROKER’S
                                        LICENCE ...................................... 689
                                     Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) - Mistake in shipping bill -
                                        Inadvertent omission to select ‘Yes’ in online platform and to mention in
                                        the shipping bills petitioner’s intention to claim  benefit under MEIS -
                                        Third and fourth  respondents directed to permit petitioner to  make
                                        necessary amendments and issue ‘No  Objection  Certificate’ to enable
                                        petitioner to claim  benefits under  MEIS from DGFT subject to  the
                                        satisfaction of the third  and fourth respondents with regard to
                                        genuineness of the 44 Shipping Bills submitted by petitioner - Section 149
                                        of Customs Act, 1962 — P.A. Footwear Pvt. Ltd. v. Director General of Foreign Trade,
                                        New Delhi (Mad.) .................................... 660
                                     Mineral ilmenite import,  Mines and Minerals (Development and
                                        Regulation) Act, 1957 is not applicable - See under EXIM ............ 654
                                     Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - See under
                                        EXIM ......................................... 654
                                     Mistake in shipping bill  being inadvertent, amendment in shipping bill
                                        allowed to claim MEIS benefits - See under MERCHANDISE EXPORTS
                                        FROM INDIA SCHEME (MEIS)  .......................... 660
                                     Natural justice  violated in re-adjudication on not furnishing documents
                                        ordered to  be furnished  by CESTAT in remand order - See under
                                        ADJUDICATION .................................. 663
                                     Non-Indian brands - Indian subsidiary of foreign country having non-
                                        Indian brands known globally cannot be denied SFIS benefits - See under
                                        FTP 2004-2009 .................................... 625
                                     Notice to assessee of petition filed by Department sent to wrong address -
                                        See under REVISION ................................ 671
                                     Offence under Customs Act, 1962 and Imports and Exports (Control) Act,
                                        1947, prosecution not sustainable without corroborative  evidence - See
                                        under PROSECUTION  ............................... 714
                                     Order - Ex parte order in  revision petition filed by Department when set
                                        aside - See under REVISION ............................ 671
                                     Pen drive data is not substantial evidence of clandestine removal - See under
                                        EVIDENCE ..................................... 632

                                                          EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st June 2020      20
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25