Page 124 - ELT_15th June 2020_VOL 372_Part 6th
P. 124

802                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372

                                     ferred challenging the show cause notice dated 7-2-2014 (Annexure-1), issued by
                                     the Commissioner, Central Excise  and  Service Tax,  Jamshedpur  as well as the
                                     Order-in-Original No. 12/Commr/2015 passed by  the Commissioner, Central
                                     Excise  and Service Tax, Jamshedpur  dated 27-2-2015/13-3-2015 (Annexure-3),
                                     mainly on the ground that the show cause notice and Order-in-Original has been
                                     passed on presumption and surmises. The highest case of the department is that
                                     there is some possibilities of clandestine removal of the M.S. Ingots, which is a
                                     final product of this petitioner.
                                            2.  Factual matrix :
                                            •    This writ petitioner is manufacturing M.S. Ingots since long.
                                            •    Show cause notice dated 7-2-2014 was given by the Commissioner,
                                                 Central Excise and Service Tax, Jamshedpur for the period running
                                                 from January, 2009 to September, 2013.
                                            •    Personal hearing in the case was held on 29-10-2014, 3-12-2014 and
                                                 22-12-2014.
                                            •    Thereafter, the Order-in-Original was passed by the Commissioner,
                                                 Central Excise and Service Tax, Jamshedpur on 27-2-2015/13-2-2015
                                                 (Annexure-3).
                                            •    The petitioner had earlier filed  an  Appeal before the Learned
                                                 CESTAT, Kolkata which  was  subsequently dismissed vide order
                                                 dated 6-1-2016.
                                            •    The petitioner further filed Tax Appeal being T.A. No. 24 of 2016 be-
                                                 fore this Hon’ble Court primarily challenging the order passed by
                                                 the Learned CESTAT, Kolkata which was withdrawn.
                                            •    Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the show cause notice as well as
                                                 by the Order-in-Original,  the present writ petition has been pre-
                                                 ferred.
                                            3.  Arguments canvassed by the Counsel for the petitioner :
                                            •    Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that there is gross
                                                 violation of principle of natural justice. The documents, which are
                                                 referred to and relied upon, in the show cause notice like :
                                                  (a)  Nucleus Group report; though were demanded, but, never
                                                       supplied.
                                                  (b)  The All India Induction Furnace Association report, though
                                                       they were never supplied.
                                            •    The whole show cause notice is issued upon presumptions and
                                                 surmises  about unaccounted manufacturing of M.S. Ingots  and
                                                 clandestine removal of the final product and nothing has been
                                                 proved by the respondents. Only on the basis of presumptions, the
                                                 show cause notice has been decided. The consumption of electricity
                                                 pattern, which is referred in the show cause notice as well as in the
                                                 Order-in-Original,  is  absolutely baseless. It is  submitted by the
                                                 Counsel for the petitioner that looking to Annexure-F, as referred in
                                                 para 5 of the show cause notice, reveals the electricity consumption
                                                 per M.T., which is absolutely in consonance with the report given
                                                 by the Joint Plant Commissioner constituted by the Ministry of Steel,
                                                 Government of India and as per this report, the consumption can be
                                                 1800 KWH/T (as referred in paragraph No. 20 of a decision report-
                                                 ed in 2009 (237) E.L.T. 674 (Tri.) in the case of R.A. Casting (Private)
                                                         EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th June 2020      124
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129