Page 210 - ELT_15th June 2020_VOL 372_Part 6th
P. 210

888                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372

                                                  2020 (372) E.L.T. 888 (Tri. - Mumbai)
                                                IN THE CESTAT, WEST ZONAL BENCH, MUMBAI
                                                       Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati, Member (J)
                                                       VALLABH WOOL INDUSTRIES
                                                                      Versus
                                              COMMR. OF CUS. (EXPORT), NHAVA SHEVA
                                           Final Order No. A/87188/2019-WZB, dated 28-11-2019 in Appeal No.
                                                                   C/86887/2013
                                            Misdeclaration - Proof  of - Self-exculpatory statement of  importer
                                     about knowledge of discrepancy in description of product obtained on interac-
                                     tions with shipper - No other evidence on record to substantiate involvement
                                     of importer - HELD : Misdeclaration was not proved - Section 111(f) of Cus-
                                     toms Act, 1962. [para 5]
                                            Import general manifest - Amendment of - It can be refused only on
                                     ground having bearing on exporter or intended purchaser, and not on import-
                                     er. [para 5]
                                            Penalty - Imposition of - Incorrect statement in import general mani-
                                     fest with fraudulent  intention - Importer  is not liable to penalty  - Sections
                                     30(iii) and 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962. [para 5]
                                                                                        Appeal partly allowed
                                                                  CASES CITED
                                     Maiden Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner — 2015 (330) E.L.T. 651 (Tribunal) — Referred  [Para 3]
                                     R.S. Impex v. Commissioner — 2018 (359) E.L.T. 593 (Tribunal) — Referred  .................................. [Para 3]
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      Shri Anil Balani, Advocate, for the Appellant.
                                                                  Ms. Trupti Chavan,  Assistant Commissioner (AR),
                                                                  for the Respondent.
                                            [Order]. - Upholding the Order-in-Original that imposed redemption fi-
                                     ne of Rs. 10,00,000/- in lieu of confiscation under Section 111(f) and penalty of
                                     Rs. 5,00,000/- under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 is assailed by the
                                     appellant in this appeal.
                                            2.  Factual backdrop of the case in brief is that IGM No. 20705/2008,
                                     dated 25-10-2008 was filed at JNCH figuring 100% Polyester Filament Yarn Raw
                                     White with importer name M/s. Vallabh Wool Industries, Ludhiana but the said
                                     goods remained as unclaimed for almost two years. Earlier Alert Circular dated
                                     3-11-2008 (RUD-1) was issued by Central Intelligence Unit (CIU) of JNCH that
                                     some importers including M/s. Vallabh Wool Industries (Appellant) were sus-
                                     pected to have been importing undervalued and misdeclared fabrics/yarn. On
                                     18th June 2010, shipping line M/s. Oasis Shipping Pvt. Ltd. filed a request for
                                     amendment of IGM No. 20705/2008 to change its description from 100% “Poly-
                                     ester Filament Yarn Raw White” to “Nylon Viscose Blended Yarn” and also to
                                     change the name of notified Party (importer) from M/s. Vallabh Wool Industries
                                     to M/s. Diamond Mink Blankets Ltd. in respect of goods covered under bills of
                                     lading No. SXNHC7137, dated 13-10-2008 that corresponds IGM No. 20705. CIU
                                     started examining the reason for seeking change of consignee’s  name and de-
                                                         EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th June 2020      210
   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215