Page 271 - ELT_15th June 2020_VOL 372_Part 6th
P. 271

2020 ]                        SUBJECT INDEX                          917
               Confiscation (Contd.)
                  smuggled - Setting aside of confiscation and penalties affirmed - Sections
                  111, 112 and  123 of  Customs Act, 1962 —  Commissioner of Customs  (Prev.),
                  Lucknow v. Pinki Agarwal (Tri. - All.) ...........................  277
               — 11 gold biscuits seized from  assessee - Burden on assessee to how he
                  obtained such goods - Adverse inference to be drawn on failure to
                  discharge the burden - 1283g of gold recovered from assessee not
                  attributable to 1166g of gold that had been purchased by him - No
                  explanation as to how he came to be in possession of the gold that was
                  found on his person - Failure by assessee to discharge his burden - Order
                  passed by adjudicating authority and order passed by Tribunal cannot be
                  faulted - When findings of fact rendered by competent bodies having
                  jurisdiction to enquire into  such facts to  be scarcely interfered with in
                  exercise of the power of judicial review unless they appear to be perverse
                  on the face of it - Single Bench picked stray line from order of Tribunal to
                  find it to be without basis - Not evident immediately as to whether the
                  import or export of gold was prohibited in the year 1994, contention that
                  since import or export of gold not prohibited at  time of seizure,
                  adjudicating authority  ought to have given assessee option in terms  of
                  Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962 cannot be permitted to be canvassed at
                  this stage - Order of Tribunal restored with costs on assessee - Sections
                  111 and 125 of Customs Act, 1962 —  Commissioner of Customs  (Preventive)  v.
                  Rajesh Pawar (Cal.) ...................................  683
               —  of smuggled silver  of foreign  marking sustainable - See under
                  SMUGGLING ....................................  724
               Connivance    of   Customs   Broker   not   established  in  non-
                  declaration/concealment, penalty not imposable - See under PENALTY ...  369
               CONSTITUTION OF INDIA :
               —  Article 14 - See under CUSTOMS BROKERS LICENSING
                  REGULATIONS, 2018  ...............................  340
               — Article 21 - See under PROSECUTION  ......................  527
               — Article 22 - See under PROSECUTION  ......................  527
               — Article 32 - See under WRIT JURISDICTION ...................  309
               — Article 226 - See under ADJUDICATION ................... 206, 614
                       — See also under ADJUDICATION PROCEEDINGS ...........  247
                       — See also under APPEAL TO APPELLATE TRIBUNAL .........  574
                       —   See   also  under  CUSTOMS     BROKERS     LICENSING
                        REGULATIONS, 2018 .........................  340
                       — See also under EXEMPTION ........................ 60
                       — See also under MONEY CREDIT SCHEME ................ 56
                       — See also under ORDER  ..........................  840
                       — See also under PENALTY .........................  551
                       — See also under QUIZ GAME  .......................  835
                       — See also under SABKA VISHWAS (LEGACY DISPUTE
                      RESOLUTION) SCHEME, 2019 .....................  522
                       — See also under SAMPLES .........................  536
                       — See also under SETTLEMENT APPLICATION .............  840
                       — See also under SHOW CAUSE NOTICE .................  536
                       — See also under SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE ............... 60
                                   EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th June 2020      271
   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276