Page 124 - ELT_1st July 2020_Vol 373_Part 1
P. 124

34                          EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 373

                                                         2020 (373) E.L.T. 34 (Cal.)
                                                      IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                                                               Madhumati Mitra, J.
                                                           NITAI CHANDRA DAS
                                                                      Versus
                                                          STATE OF WEST BENGAL
                                                     C.R.R. No. 3463 of 2015, decided on 3-9-2019
                                            Protection to Customs Officers from prosecution and other legal pro-
                                     ceedings for bona fide action taken in discharge of their duties under the Cus-
                                     toms Act,  1962  - Acts of petitioners/accused persons alleged  to have been
                                     committed in discharge of their official duties which they were required to do
                                     as per the order issued by Customs Authority to find out fake Indian currency
                                     Notes - Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), West Bengal refused to grant
                                     sanction for prosecution and opined that petitioners being Customs officers,
                                     entitled to get protection under Section 155 read with Section 106 of Customs
                                     Act, 1962 - Court debarred from taking cognizance of offence in view of sub-
                                     section (i) of Section 197 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Accordingly,
                                     Criminal proceedings under Sections 384,  411 and 34 of Indian Penal  Code,
                                     1860 pending before  the Learned  Additional Chief  Judicial  Magistrate,
                                     Murshidabad, are hereby quashed. [paras 22, 24, 25]
                                                                                          Application allowed
                                                                  CASES CITED
                                     Costao Fernandes v. State at the Instance of D.S.P., C.B.I. —
                                         1996 (82) E.L.T. 433 (S.C.) — Referred ......................................................................................... [Para 17]
                                     Nirmal Kanti Roy v. State of West Bengal — (1998) 4 SCC 590 — Referred ................................... [Para 17]
                                                    DEPARTMENTAL CLARIFICATION CITED
                                     Additional Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata Circular No. VIII (48) 04/CUS/
                                         P/WB/Tech/10/Part-1, dated 10-8-2010  ............................................................................ [Paras 3, 14]
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      S/Shri  Milan  Mukherjee, Sr.  Advocate, Rudra
                                                                  Jyoti Bhattacharjee, Ms. Debjani Ghosal and Santanu
                                                                  Talukdar, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
                                                                  Shri Rana Mukherjee, Addl. P.P. and Ms. Debjani
                                                                  Sahu, Advocate, for the Respondent.
                                            [Order]. - This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Crimi-
                                     nal Procedure filed by the petitioners praying for quashing of Charge-sheet being
                                     No. 220/13, dated 21st June, 2013 including the order of taking cognizance on
                                     dated  16th February,  2015 in connection with the criminal proceedings being
                                     G.R. Case No. 2034 of 2010 under Sections 384/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code
                                     pending before the Learned Additional Chief  Judicial Magistrate,  Jangipur,
                                     Murshidabad.
                                            2.  Before dealing with the rival submissions of the parties, it would be
                                     appropriate to set out the facts briefly.
                                            3.  The petitioners were the officials of Customs Department, Jangipur,
                                     Murshidabad at the material point of time. The Additional Commissioner of Cus-
                                     toms by a Circular being No. VIII (48)04/CUS/P/WB/Tech/10/Part-1, dated 10-
                                                          EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st July 2020      124
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129