Page 19 - ELT_15th July 2020_Vol 373_Part 2
P. 19

2020 ]                      INDEX -  15th July, 2020                 xvii
               EOUs supplies  under ICB amounting to deemed export, refund  of TED
                  admissible - See under REFUND/REFUND CLAIM  ..............  217
               Exemption not admissible on import of Segway in CKD condition - See
                  under SEGWAY  ..................................  267
               — on imported goods granted on basis of certificate of Central  Excise
                  authorities, Commissioner Central Excise has jurisdiction to adjudicate in
                  case of diversion of imported goods - See under ADJUDICATION  ......  258
               EXIM  - Advance authorisation licence -  Redemption - Non-fulfilment of
                  export obligation - Failure  to file copy of bill  of export in  respect  of
                  supplies made to SEZ - Adequate proof of fulfilment of export obligation
                  available on record despite this lapse - Consumption certificate placed on
                  record by petitioner indicating details of consumption namely, the
                  supplier  name, consignee name, customer  LOA No./PO No.,  SEZ
                  notification number and date, co-relating with the SEZ notification
                  number and the advance license  number and date - Consumption
                  certificate/‘Certificate of Receipt of Supply’ duly signed by statutory
                  authorities namely, the Range Superintendent of Central Excise and the
                  Development Commissioner, SEZ to be accepted as proof of export
                  especially when such relaxation is extended to similarly situated units in
                  condoning the procedural of non-filing of the bills of export -
                  Proceedings remanded to respondent No. 3 to examine the ‘Certificate of
                  Receipt of Supply’ produced - RA may accept other documents in lieu of
                  bill of export provided there is a corroborative evidence/co-relation  to
                  ARE-1/Excise attested invoice  bearing the details of advance
                  authorization/file number under which the goods  were removed for
                  discharge of export obligation — ABB India Ltd. v. Union of India (Kar.) .......  205
               — Advance authorization for gold - “Gold jewellery” mentioned as items of
                  Export for which duty free import of input would be available and for
                  which Central Government provided for Advance Authorization for
                  Precious Metals as listed in para 4.33 of Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 -
                  DGFT only empowered to notify Handbook of Procedures for the
                  purposes of laying down the procedures to be followed by exporter or
                  the importer  vide para 1.03 ibid. - Categorisation or  recategorization
                  cannot be done by the policy circulars but to be undertaken by specific
                  amendment to Foreign Trade Policy under Section 5 of Foreign Trade
                  (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 - Consequently, powers exercised
                  by DGFT while issuing the impugned DGFT Public Notice No. 35/2015-
                  20, dated 26-9-2019 which puts  restrictions  upon issuance  of advance
                  authorisation for Gold Medallions and Coins is  beyond the power,
                  jurisdiction and authority of DGFT — M.D. Overseas Limited v. Union of India
                  (Del.)   .........................................  151
               — Fuel import under Advance Licence -  DEPB rate fixation - In this case,
                  petitioner has imported fuel under Advance Licence Scheme without
                  importing any other item  under this scheme and has fulfilled export
                  obligation of amount much more than cost of imported fuel - Clause 4(d)
                  of para 2.4 of Foreign Trade Policy, 2002-2007, explicitly providing that
                  cost of such fuel should not be taken into account while fixing DEPB rate
                  for such products against which fuel has been allowed as an input even if
                  fuel is included under SION - In view of above, no interference required
                  in writ appeal filed against order of single judge setting aside action
                  taken against petitioner - Writ appeal not sustainable —  Union of India v.
                  Welcast Steels Ltd. (Kar.) .................................  229
                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th July 2020      19
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24