Page 275 - ELT_15th July 2020_Vol 373_Part 2
P. 275

2020 ]  ATLAS COPCO INDIA LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUS. (IMPORT), NHAVA SHEVA  257

                            2020 (373) E.L.T. 257 (Tri. - Mumbai)
                           IN THE CESTAT, WEST ZONAL BENCH, MUMBAI
                 Shri C.J. Mathew, Member (T) and Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati, Member (J)
                                   ATLAS COPCO INDIA LTD.
                                                Versus
                    COMMISSIONER OF CUS. (IMPORT), NHAVA SHEVA
                  Final Order Nos. A/85279-85280/2020-WZB, dated 19-2-2020 in Application
                       Nos. C/EH/86444-86445/2019 in Appeal Nos. C/85264-85265/2014
                       Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) - Limitation - Relevant date - The
               date of rejection of application for amendment of bill of entry by adjudicating
               authority to be considered  as relevant date  for  computation of  limitation
               period for filing appeal against adjudication order - Taking this date as rela-
               vant  date, appeal  filed before Commissioner (Appeals)  considered to have
               been filed within time - Matter remanded to Commissioner (Appeals) for dis-
               posal on merits - Sections 129 and 149 of Customs Act, 1962. [para 4]
                                                                        Matter remanded
                       REPRESENTED BY :     Shri Jayadeas S., Sr. Manager, for the Appellant.
                                            Shri  K.K. Srivastava, Additional  Commissioner
                                            (AR), for the Respondent.
                       [Order]. -  These applications seek out of turn disposal of Appeals No.
               C/85264/2014 and C/85265/2014 against Order-in-Appeal No. 990(Gr,V)/2013
               (JNCH)/IMP-761, dated  23-10-2013 and Order-in-Appeal No.  02 (Gr,V)/2013
               (JNCH)/IMP-02, dated 21-1-2013 of Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), JNCH,
               Nhava Sheva.
                       2.  Authorised Representative of the appellant submits that the matter
               has been pending for a substantially long period and application for out of turn
               may be allowed.
                       3.  We have heard the Authorised Representative.
                       4.  As the issue involved is limited to relevant date along with dismissal
               of appeals by first appellate authority solely for having been delayed beyond the
               condonable period, we take the appeals for disposal. On perusal of impugned
               order, we find that first appellate authority has noted the delay of 965 and 842
               days respectively for disposal of appeals. We also find that the issue impugned
               order before first appellate authority was rejection of applications made under
               Section  149 of Customs  Act, 1962. The said rejection, dated  28th August 2012,
               renders the filing of appeal to have been within the period by first appellate au-
               thority. Accordingly, we remand the matter to first appellate authority with di-
               rection to dispose of the appeals on merits.
                                 (Dictated and pronounced in open Court)

                                                _______



                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th July 2020      275
   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280