Page 107 - ELT_1st August 2020_Vol 373_Part 3
P. 107

Law




                                   2020 (373) E.L.T. 289 (S.C.)
                                 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                             S.A. Bobde, CJI., B.R. Gavai and Surya Kant, JJ.
                                              ITC LTD.
                                                Versus
                              NORASIA CONTAINER LINES LTD.

                    Civil Appeal Nos. 9706-9708 of 2010  with C.A. Nos. 9709-9711 of 2010,
                                                    1
                                           decided on 5-2-2020
                       Re-export  of hazardous  waste imported  as waste paper - Penal  and
               criminal  action against importer - Sustainability - On re-export of aforesaid
               objectionable material back to sender in USA,  alleged  illegality of  Customs
               Act, 1962 no longer survives as appellant have shown their bona fide in ensur-
               ing its return - Accordingly impugned directions of High Court to initiate pe-
               nal and criminal proceedings against importers set aside - Criminal proceed-
               ings, if already initiated  and pending in Trial Court be disposed of expedi-
               tiously - Section 114 of Customs Act, 1962. [paras 1, 2, 3]
                                                                         Appeal allowed
                       REPRESENTED BY :     S/Shri Arvind P. Datar, Senior Advocate, Rajan Na-
                                            rain, AOR and Kishan Rawat, Advocate, for the Ap-
                                            pellant.
                                            S/Shri  A.K. Shrivastava, Senior  Advocate, M.T.
                                            George, S. Ravi Shankar, B. Krishna Prasad, Anil
                                            Katiyar, R. Nedumaran, AORs, Mrs. Susy Abraham,
                                            Johns  George, Rupesh Kumar,  Ms. Aruna Gupta,
                                            Umesh Kumar Saw and  S.  Muthukrishnan, Advo-
                                            cates, for the Respondent.
                       [Order]. - Heard Learned Counsel for both sides.
                       1.  It is not disputed that the objectionable material has been sent back
               to the original exporter in the United States. Thus, any alleged illegality in rela-
               tion to the Customs Act, [1962] is not survived. The appellant appears to have
               shown their bona fides by ensuring the return of the offensive material.
               ________________________________________________________________________
               1  On appeal from 2009 (247) E.L.T. 60 (Mad.); See also 2017 (349) E.L.T. A160 (S.C.).
                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st August 2020      107
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112