Page 160 - ELT_1st August 2020_Vol 373_Part 3
P. 160

342                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 373

                                            11.6  It was further submitted that if all other forms of seeds for con-
                                     sumption are freely importable under Schedules-V and VII of the Plant Quaran-
                                     tine Order, there is no justification for controlling  only cotton  grains  for con-
                                     sumption and not any other seeds, which may have higher or similar tendencies
                                     of being sown or to spread infections or pests. It was submitted that seeds for
                                     sowing and seeds for consumption, being well defined under the Plant Quaran-
                                     tine Order, can very well permit the Plant Quarantine Department to impose fur-
                                     ther conditions on import of “cotton seed for consumption” as grains, as is done
                                     for all other commodities like coriander, sesame, sunflower, rabi and many other
                                     seeds. Hence, to ensure that these seeds are not being used for sowing, checks
                                     and tests could be undertaken, instead of expressing mere doubts and apprehen-
                                     sions that they may be used for sowing. It was submitted that additional checks
                                     and balances can be prescribed for import of cotton grains as “animal feed” in
                                     the form of whole grains so that they are not consumed for any other purpose. It
                                     was, accordingly, urged that the impugned notification defining “animal feed”
                                     deserves to be quashed and set aside and the petition deserves to be allowed by
                                     granting the reliefs as prayed for.
                                            12.  Opposing the petition, Mr. Nirzar Desai, Learned Senior Standing
                                     Counsel for the respondents, invited the attention of the Court to the findings
                                     recorded by this Court in Special Civil Application No. 22428 of 2017 [2019 (24)
                                     G.S.T.L. 179 (Guj.)] in the earlier round of litigation. It was submitted that the
                                     DI&P Act empowers the Union of India to issue  notification  in the Gazette of
                                     India  in public interest for imposing  restrictions for the import into India of
                                     plants/plant products to deter introduction of exotic/alien pests along with
                                     plants and plant products into the country from the country of export. It was
                                     submitted that on the other hand the Union Government has issued a number of
                                     notifications in exercise of powers conferred upon it under the DI&P Act for al-
                                     lowing significant species of plants and plant products either to boost productivi-
                                     ty of crops or to meet with the country’s requirement of food products.
                                            12.1  It was submitted that the notifications issued from time to time are
                                     in public interest to categorise plant products to deter or eliminate risk of pests,
                                     diseases and weeds from entering into  the  country which  might  be  associated
                                     with plants and plant products. It was submitted that the risk of pests’ introduc-
                                     tion is determined by conducting Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) under the provisions
                                     contained in Clause-3, Chapter-II of the Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import
                                     into India) Order, 2003.
                                            12.2  It was submitted that it is true that any grain or seeds can be used
                                     as animal feed, but all grains or seeds of different plants might actually have dif-
                                     ferent degree of exotic/alien pests’ introduction risk into the country from the
                                     exporting country. It was submitted that it is in this background that the compe-
                                     tent authority has elaborated the definition of “animal feed” to deter the risk of
                                     exotic/alien pests’ introduction into the country from other parts of the world.
                                            12.3  It was submitted that the impugned notification does not deprive
                                     any importer or individual from importing “animal feed” and the only re-
                                     striction imposed is to the import of any grains or seeds of any plant species in
                                     the garb of “animal feed”. However, the importer can always import the notified
                                     plants and plant products, including cotton seeds, through the right channel. It
                                     was submitted that cotton is a very dominant commercial crop of this country,
                                                         EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st August 2020      160
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165