Page 188 - ELT_1st August 2020_Vol 373_Part 3
P. 188

370                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 373

                                            4.  In W.P. No. 22282 of 2009, the petitioner has challenged the order-in-
                                     appeal, dated 27-11-2008 Bearing Reference No. 11/47/08-09/ECA-I/1583 of the
                                     2nd respondent Additional Director General of Foreign Trade (as an Appellate
                                     Authority) under the provisions of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regula-
                                     tion) Act, 1992  against  the order dated  13-2-2008 bearing  reference F.No.
                                     32/95/181/00045/AM05 of the 3rd respondent Joint Director-General of Foreign
                                     Trade, Coimbatore.
                                            5.  The Joint Director General of Foreign Trade had earlier passed  an
                                     order dated 13-2-2008 and had imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,63,44,084/- on the Peti-
                                     tioner in W.P. No. 22282 of 2009 under Section 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Devel-
                                     opment and Regulation)  Act, 1992 pursuant to Show Cause  Notice dated  2-5-
                                     2005 bearing reference F.No. 32/95/181/00045/AM05.
                                            6.  By the impugned order dated 27-11-2008, the 2nd respondent Addi-
                                     tional Director-General of Foreign Trade (as an Appellate Authority) has partly
                                     allowed the appeal by reducing the penalty to Rs. 50,000/-, but at the same time
                                     has imposed interest at 15%  from 16-9-1993 to 31-12-2003  amounting to
                                     Rs. 5,78,232/- as against the customs duty foregone at the time of import for a
                                     sum of Rs. 2,52,090/-.
                                            7.  In both the cases, the petitioners  have imported capital  goods on
                                     payment of  at concessional  rate of customs duty in terms of Notification  No.
                                     160/92-Cus.,  dated 20-4-1992 of the Central Government of India, Ministry of
                                     Finance (Department of Revenue), for import of capital goods under the Export
                                     Promotion Capital Goods scheme (EPCG).  The said Notification was issued to
                                     implement the decision of the Government of India, Ministry of Commerce in the
                                     Export and Import Policy as in force between 1st April, 1992 and 31st March 1997
                                     announced under Section 5 of the aforesaid Act.
                                            8.  Paragraph Nos. 102 to 104 of the said Policy read as under :
                                            102.  Before clearance of goods through Customs, the importer shall exe-
                                            cute an Indemnity-cum-Surety Bond for fulfillment of the export obligation
                                            with the licensing authority in whose jurisdiction the licensee is situated or
                                            the Export Obligation Cell in the Office of the Chief Controller of Imports
                                            and Exports, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi. All bonds, after acceptance, shall
                                            be transferred to the Export Obligation Cell in the office of the Chief Con-
                                            troller of Imports and Exports, which shall monitor the progress made to-
                                            wards fulfillment of export obligation. The amount of bank guarantee shall
                                            be equivalent to the full value of the duty saved through import under this
                                            scheme.
                                            103.  The EPCG licence holder shall submit, every six months a progress
                                            report of his exports, as certified by a chartered accountant, to the Chief
                                            Controller of Imports and Exports. Further, for redemption of his Indemni-
                                            ty-cum-Surety  Bond, on the completion  of his export obligation, he shall
                                            submit a consolidated statement of his exports, as certified by a chartered
                                            accountant, along with a certificate from his banker, confirming the realiza-
                                            tion of the export proceeds.
                                            104.  Failure to fulfil the export obligation shall entail penal action under
                                            the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, Imports (Control) Order, 1955
                                            and the Customs Act, 1962.
                                            105.  In case of failure to fulfil the export obligation, either in full or in
                                            part, within the stipulated period, the Indemnity-cum-Surety Bond shall be

                                                         EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st August 2020      188
   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193