Page 231 - ELT_1st August 2020_Vol 373_Part 3
P. 231

2020 ]   COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BHARUCH v. HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD.   413

                       15.1  On the perusal of the provisional bills of entry, TR-6 challans, final
                       assessment bills of entry, Annexure sheet of Cenvat credit of CVD A SAD
                       before assessment and final  assessment submitted by the assessee at the
                       time of personal bearing, I find that the customs duties are levied on the
                       copper concentrate on  ad valorem basis based on the value determined in
                       terms of section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Custom Valuation
                       Rules, 2007. The price of the copper concentrate is fixed based on LME
                       price, therefore the bills of entry were provisionally ‘assessed. After provi-
                       sional assessment by the Proper Officer under section 18 of the Customs
                       Act, 1962, the assessee had paid duties in respect of bills of entry filed at the
                       port of import. Thereafter, the assessee had availed the credit of CVD, Edn.
                       Cess, SH Edn Cess and SAD paid under the provisionally assessed bills of
                       entry.
                       The contention of the department in denying the credit to the appellant is
                       not legally correct. I find that in a scheme of Cenvat Credit Rules, there are
                       certain parameters on the basis of which the manufacturer is entitled for
                       taking the credit. The parameters are mainly, the goods should be received
                       in the factory, the goods are utilized in the manufacture of excisable final
                       product and  no dispute regarding payment of duty in respect  of such
                       goods. In the case of the assessee, all the parameters have been fulfilled by
                       them.
                       15.2  Further under Rule 9(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules at Sl. No. ‘C’, the
                       main document mentioned is “Bill of Entry”. I find that the [said Sl.] of Rule
                       9(1) does not state that Bill of Entry should not be provisionally assessed or
                       Bill of Entry should be finally assessed only. From this entry’ at Rule 9(1)
                       ‘C, Bill of Entry whether it is provisional or final is the document on which
                       credit can be availed by the manufacturer.’ I also find that under Section
                       2(4) of the Customs Act, Bill of Entry means a Bill of Entry referred to in
                       Section 46 of the Customs Act and under Section 2(2) assessment includes
                       provisional assessment, reassessment and any order of assessment in which
                       duty assessed is ‘Nil’. From the scheme of the Customs Act, when goods
                       are cleared against a Bill of Entry, the Bill of Entry has to be assessed either
                       provisionally or finally and  provisional assessment is also an assessment
                       under Section 2(2) of the Customs Act. Goods cannot be cleared from the
                       Customs unless the Bill of Entry is assessed. Therefore, the entry at Rule
                       9(1) ‘C’ will include the Bill of Entry either provisionally assessed or finally
                       assessed.
                       I find that credit has been taken as per provisions of the law;
                            -    duty as assessed, has been (sic) on inputs
                            -    Documents i.e. Bills of Entry on the basis of which credit has
                                 been taken arc proper and not disputed.
                            -    Goods i.e. inputs have been received in the factory and duly
                                 accounted.
                            -    Inputs have been used  in the manufacture of final dutiable
                                 product.
                       15.3  It is also found that there is no dispute regarding the BCD paid on
                       the difference of value between provisional and final assessment in terms of
                       Section 18(2)(n) of the Customs Act, 1962, which was sanctioned in O-I-O
                       No. 110/DC/SRT/REFUND/2014, dated  29-12-2014 passed by Deputy
                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st August 2020      231
   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236