Page 232 - ELT_1st September 2020_Vol 373_Part 5
P. 232

670                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 373

                                            revenue where statutory remedies are available are not such matters. We can also
                                            take judicial notice of the fact that the vast majority of the petitions under
                                            Article 226 of the Constitution are filed solely for the purpose of obtaining
                                            interim orders and thereafter prolong the proceedings by one device or the
                                            other. The practice certainly needs to be strongly discouraged.”
                                                                    (Emphasis supplied)
                                            26.  In view of the aforesaid facts, reasoning and  judicial pronounce-
                                     ments, there is no substance in this  writ petition and the same is, therefore,
                                     dismissed.
                                                                     _______

                                                    2020 (373) E.L.T. 670 (Telangana)

                                           IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
                                                                  HYDERABAD
                                                 M.S. Ramachandra Rao and T. Amarnath Goud, JJ.
                                                         R.K. DIGITAL SOLUTIONS
                                                                      Versus
                                                              UNION OF INDIA
                                                      W.P. No. 3736 of 2020, decided on 30-4-2020
                                            Provisional assessment - Import of gold granules from Indonesia - Cer-
                                     tificate of Origin, verification thereof - Release of Bank Guarantee - In view of
                                     fact  that petitioner has  produced verification certificates from Indonesian
                                     Government, retroactive  verification  of which has not  been  initiated by  de-
                                     partment within prescribed time, there is no dispute with regard to Country of
                                     Origin of aforesaid goods - In view of above department directed to finalize
                                     provisional assessment carried out at time of import, within 3 months - Bank
                                     Guarantee and Bond filed by petitioner be also returned - Section 18 of Cus-
                                     toms Act, 1962 - Article 226 of Constitution of India. [paras 15, 16, 17]
                                                                                              Petition allowed
                                                                   CASE CITED
                                     R.K. Digital Solutions v. Union of India — W.P. No. 1356 of 2020, decided on
                                         3-2-2020 by Telangana High Court — Referred ........................................................................ [Para 11]
                                                    DEPARTMENTAL CLARIFICATIONS CITED
                                     C.B.E. & C. Circular No. 38/2016-Cus., dated 22-8-2016 .................................................................... [Para 7]
                                            [Order per : M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.]. - Petitioner herein is a partner-
                                     ship firm engaged in internal trade in various commodities by way of imports
                                     and exports.
                                            2.  It imported certain quantity of gold granules vide six bills of entry,
                                     details of which are annexed in Annexure P.2.1.
                                            3.  The petitioner classified the said  imported goods under CTH No.
                                     7108 1300  of the  Customs Tariff Act  and claimed exemption from payment  of
                                     Customs duty in terms of Sl. No. 966 of the table to Notification No. 82 of 2018-
                                     Cus., dated 31-12-2018 amending Notification No. 46/2011, dated 1-6-2011.

                                                        EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st September 2020      232
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237