Page 199 - GSTL_26th March 2020_Vol 34_Part 4
P. 199

2020 ]                        SUBJECT INDEX                          693
                  him - Tribunal refusing to condone delay of 812 days in filing appeal by
                  not satisfying the reason explained therefor that the other appeal against
                  pre-deposit order also to be heard along with it - Assessee pleading for
                  remand of the matter to Tribunal for consideration on merits as he has a
                  good case on merits and as on date has deposited entire Service Tax
                  demand with interest - Said order of Tribunal cannot be interfered on a
                  plea of taking lenient view while dealing with condonation  of  delay
                  application and hardship caused to assessee as he had an excellent case
                  on  merits, inasmuch as unless conditional pre-deposit  order passed  by
                  Commissioner (Appeals) is set aside by any Court, consequential order
                  passed by him dismissing appeal for non-compliance thereof cannot be
                  interfered - Section 86 of Finance Act, 1994 — G. Mahesh Babu v. Commissioner
                  of Customs Excise and Service Tax (Telangana) .......................  422
               Applicability of provisions of Central Excise Act, 1944 to Service Tax, scope
                  of - See under FINANCE ACT, 1994  ........................ 39
               Application  by Recipient not  maintainable  before AAR - See under
                  ADVANCE RULING AUTHORITY........................  371
               —  Refund of input tax credit, application seeking  ruling with  regard to
                  documents to be filed, not maintainable - See under ADVANCE RULING . .   329
               Areca nuts - Detention of truck containing areca nuts on ground of forgery
                  of documents, sustainability of seizure under IPC provisions - See under
                  SEIZURE ......................................  133
               Arrest - Default bail under GST law on filing charge sheet on 61st day from
                  date of arrest - See under BAIL  ........................... 29
               ASSAM GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 :
               — Section 67 - See under SEIZURE ..........................  133
               Assessment - Order against deceased assessee - Assessment orders rendered
                  in March, 2019 passed against assessee who died in March, 2018 - Orders
                  nullity in law - Liberty to concerned Authority to take fresh action in said
                  assessment proceedings, after ascertaining from competent Revenue
                  Officials as to who all are legal representatives or legal heirs of said
                  deceased assessee - Sections 73 and 93 of Central Goods and Services Tax
                  Act, 2017 — Vimal Raj v. State Tax Officer-1, State GST Department, Kottayam (Ker.) ....  414
               Association - Maintenance of common area in residential complex, taxability
                  of services  supplied by Association to Members - See under
                  RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX .............................  360
               —  members  consisting  of owners  of apartments in complex, scope of
                  exemption on contribution - See under MAINTENANCE OF COMMON
                  AREA IN RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX .......................  360
               Attachment - Bank accounts provisional attachment not sustainable on
                  absence of pendency of any proceedings - See under PROVISIONAL
                  ATTACHMENT ..................................  203
               — of Bank Account - Power for provisional attachment of bank account - It is
                  not absolute - Expression  “is of  opinion” or “has  reason to believe”
                  indicates that subjective satisfaction of  Commissioner  depends on facts
                  and circumstances of each case - “Opinion” must have  rational
                  connection with or relevant bearing on formation of opinion - Rational
                  connection requires direct nexus/live link between protection of interest
                  and available property which might not be available at time of recovery
                  of taxes after final adjudication of dispute - “Opinion” must be formed in
                  good faith and  not  be  mere  pretence  -  Courts  can  determine  whether
                                    GST LAW TIMES      26th March 2020      295
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204