Page 67 - GSTL_26th March 2020_Vol 34_Part 4
P. 67

2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 577 (S.C.)

                                 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                        Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ.
                                        G. MAHESH BABU
                                                Versus
                      COMMR. OF CUS., C. EX. & S.T. (APPEALS II & VI)
                                                                          1
                            Civil Appeal No. 9130 of 2019, decided on 29-11-2019
                       Appeal to Appellate Authority - Dismissal thereof for non-compliance
               of pre-deposit order - Delay in filing second appeal  leading to its dismissal -
               Restoration on cost - Appellant-assessee pleading that he was under bona fide
               belief that preliminary appeal filed before Tribunal against order of Commis-
               sioner (Appeals) declining to grant unconditional stay would  be listed first
               which resulted in delay of 812 days in filing main appeal before Tribunal -
               Notwithstanding controversy as to whether said preliminary appeal was filed
               or not, since meanwhile entire due amount of tax and penalty has been recov-
               ered from appellant, interest of justice demands that case now be decided on
               merits - Accordingly, impugned orders are quashed and appeal restored before
               Commissioner (Appeals) for deciding it on merits subject to payment of cost of
               ` 50,000 within three weeks by appellant - On failure to pay cost ibid, appeal
               shall not be restored - Section 85 of Finance Act, 1994. [paras 8, 9, 10]
                                                                         Appeal allowed
                       REPRESENTED BY :     S/Shri K. Parameshwar, AOR and M.V. Mukunda,
                                            Advocate, for the Appellant.
                                            S/Shri Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG, B. Krishna Prasad,
                                            AOR, Rajnish Prasad and Ms. Aruna Gupta, Advo-
                                            cates, for the Respondent.
                       [Order]. - Leave granted.
                       2.  This  appeal arises  from the dismissal of  an  appeal initially by the
               Commissioner (Appeals) for non-deposit of an amount of Rs. 16.50 lakhs by way
               of pre-deposit. Following the non-deposit, the appeal was dismissed. The appeal
               filed before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (“CESTAT”)
               was dismissed on account of a delay of 812 days. The High Court was of the
               view that in the circumstances of the case, no case for interference was made out.
                       3.  The dispute in the present case pertains to the period 1 April, 2007
               ________________________________________________________________________
               1  On appeal from 2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 422 (Telengana).
                                    GST LAW TIMES      26th March 2020      163
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72