Page 94 - GSTL_26th March 2020_Vol 34_Part 4
P. 94

604                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 34
                                            9.  The order cited by the Learned Counsel for the petitioner, which has
                                     been extracted supra squarely covers the facts of the present case. The second
                                     respondent has clearly predetermined the entire issue and has directed the peti-
                                     tioner to pay the penalty along with GST, without conducting any enquiry.
                                            10.  In the result, the impugned proceedings of the second respondent
                                     dated 26-12-2019 is hereby quashed. The second respondent is directed to issue a
                                     fresh show cause notice to the petitioner setting out all the details and the peti-
                                     tioner is directed to submit his explanation/objection and on receipt of the same,
                                     the second respondent is directed to proceed strictly in accordance with law by
                                     affording an opportunity to the petitioner.
                                            11.  This writ petition is  allowed with the above directions. No costs.
                                     Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
                                                                     _______


                                                       2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 604 (Bom.)
                                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                         Nitin Jamdar and M.S. Karnik, JJ.
                                                 GREAT SANDS CONSULTING PVT. LTD.

                                                                      Versus
                                                              UNION OF INDIA
                                                 Writ Petition (L) No. 272 of 2020, decided on 14-2-2020
                                            Registration - Cancellation of - Registration cancelled on the ground
                                     that no reply to show cause notice - Reply submitted prior to passing of order
                                     as endorsed by Department - Cancellation order passed without considering
                                     reply set aside - Proceedings restored to stage of issuance of show cause notice
                                     - Section 29 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. [paras 4, 5, 6, 7]
                                                                                             Petition allowed
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      S/Shri  Vikram  Nankani, Senior Advocate  with
                                                                  Kishore Kunal and Nikhil Mendge, for the Petitioner.
                                                                  S/Shri  Dushyant  Kumar, AGP, G. Hariharan  with
                                                                  A.A. Ansari, for the Respondent.
                                            [Order]. - P.C. :  Heard the Learned Counsel for the parties.
                                            2.  By this Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the order dated 1 Janu-
                                     ary,  2020 cancelling the registration of  the Petitioner under the Central Goods
                                     and Services Tax Act, 2017.
                                            3.  The Petitioner was issued a show cause notice on 28 December, 2019
                                     as to why the Petitioner’s registration should not be cancelled. The reason in the
                                     show cause was thus :
                                            “(1)  You have filed GSTR-3B returns up to Oct., 2019 in which you have
                                            shown tax liability as well as have claimed Input Tax Credit. This implies
                                            that your business status is active. However, from scrutiny of place of
                                            business and visit report of State Tax Officer it is evident that you are not
                                            conducting business at the Place of Business mentioned in your registra-
                                            tion profile. Hence, explanation is required why your registration should
                                            not be cancelled ab initio i.e. from the date of registration.”
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      26th March 2020      190
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99