Page 101 - GSTL_2nd April 2020_Vol 35_Part 1
P. 101

2020 (35) G.S.T.L. 3 (All.)

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                      Biswanath Somadder and Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ.
                                       BHIM DUTT PANDE
                                                Versus
                                         UNION OF INDIA
                               Writ Tax No. 248 of 2018, decided on 14-2-2020
                       GST levy on Government Contracts - Tender filed during pre-GST
               regime - Restrictions on tax deduction - Petitioner pleading that while filing
               Tender Documents for repair and maintenance contract for Railways in pre-
               GST regime, he had factored only that portion of tax which was leviable at that
               time while GST rate of 12% came into force subsequently - HELD : Factually
               established that Railways had issued LOA on 28-7-2017 when GST Act having
               been enacted on 12-4-2017 had come into force on 1-7-2017 - LOA specifically
               mentioned about levy of GST at applicable rates - Payment for contract has
               also been received - Accordingly, petitioner’s contention of restricting deduc-
               tion of tax amount, not acceptable - Section 9 of Central Goods and Services
               Tax Act, 2017 - Article 226 of Constitution of India. [paras 4, 5]
                                                                      Petition dismissed
                       REPRESENTED BY :     Shri Mahabir Yadav, Counsel, for the Petitioner.
                                            Shri Ravi Prakash Pandey, Counsel, for the Respond-
                                            ent.
                       [Order]. - The petitioner has approached this Court seeking its interven-
               tion for the purpose of restraining the respondent - North Central Railway Ad-
               ministration - to deduct any amount more than 2% in the name of tax from the
               bill of the writ petitioner.
                       2.  The petitioner claims to be a Railway Civil Contractor based at
               Allahabad. According to the petitioner, he had participated in a bid for execution
               of annual repairs and maintenance of zonal work for GM bungalow and officers
               quarters in terms of a tender which was uploaded on 28th March, 2017. Accord-
               ing to the petitioner, he had quoted his rate before the North Central Railway
               Administration in anticipation that he would be liable for the taxation at the rate
               of 2% [VAT (4-2) + Service Tax 0%].
                       3.  It is the specific case of the writ petitioner that in the meantime, VAT
               and Service Tax was replaced by GST and the new taxation system came into
               force on 1st July, 2017, whereupon the writ petitioner was held liable for GST on
                                    GST LAW TIMES      2nd April 2020      165
                                                  777
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106