Page 162 - GSTL_2nd April 2020_Vol 35_Part 1
P. 162

64                            GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 35

                                                        2020 (35) G.S.T.L. 64 (Guj.)
                                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                                                      J.B. Pardiwala and Bhargav D. Karia, JJ.
                                                             ABB INDIA LIMITED
                                                                      Versus
                                                              UNION OF INDIA

                                        Civil Application (For Orders) No. 2 of 2020 and R/Special Civil Application
                                                         No. 728 of 2020, decided on 11-2-2020
                                            Notice for confiscation of goods - Form GST MOV-10 - Time-limit for
                                     payment of tax after detention - Applicability - In earlier interim order in main
                                     writ filed against issuance of GST MOV-07 and GST MOV-09, this Court had
                                     directed release of detained/seized goods and vehicle on payment of 50% of
                                     tax and  penalty  involved and filing  bank  guarantee for balance  50%, which
                                     were duly complied with by petitioner within time-limit granted in said inter-
                                     im order - Therefore, issuance of notice for confiscation of goods by issuing
                                     GST MOV-10 on the ground that amount of tax had not been deposited within
                                     14 days of detention of goods, is erroneous and is against specific directions of
                                     Court - Not clear as to how aforesaid period of 14 days has been mentioned in
                                     impugned  notice  -  Apparently interim order  ibid has been misconstrued  by
                                     authorities -  In  view of specific interim  order ibid,  statutory provision  pre-
                                     scribing time-limit had no role to play - Impugned notice quashed - Sections
                                     129 and 130 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Article 226 of Consti-
                                     tution of India. [paras 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11]
                                                                                          Application allowed
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      Shri Sujit Ghosh and Miss. Mannat Warich, Advo-
                                                                  cates for Gupta Law Associates, for the Petitioner.
                                            [Judgment per : J.B. Pardiwala, J.]. - Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. An-
                                     kit Shah, the Learned Standing Counsel waives service of notice of rule for and
                                     on behalf of the opponent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. Soaham Joshi, the Learned Assis-
                                     tant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the
                                     opponent No. 5.
                                            2.  By this application, the applicant-original petitioner has prayed for
                                     the following reliefs :
                                            “A.  Your Lordship be pleased to admit and allow the application;
                                            B.   Pending hearing and final disposal of the main petition, Your Lord-
                                                 ship may be pleased to stay the Notices issued in Form GST MOV-
                                                 10 received by the Applicant on 5-2-2020.
                                            C.  Your Lordship be pleased to pass any such other orders that may be
                                                 deemed fit, just and proper in the interest of justice.”
                                            3.  In the main matter, i.e. Special Civil Application No. 728 of 2020, this
                                     Court, on 10-1-2020, has passed the following order :
                                            “1.  Rule returnable on 12-2-2020. Mr. Chintan Dave, the Learned  AGP
                                            waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the Respondents Nos. 2,
                                            3, and 5.The Respondents Nos. 1 and 4 shall be served by Registered Post
                                            Acknowledgment with Due.
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      2nd April 2020      226
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167