Page 140 - GSTL_23rd April 2020_Vol 35_Part 4
P. 140

466                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 35
                                     Air and water provided by the appellant constitute less than 0.5% of the cost of
                                     generating power whereas coal as provided by JSL constitutes more than 95% of
                                     the cost
                                            23.  The Appellant seeks reference to a certificate issued by their cost ac-
                                     countant - S.R. Bhargave & Co. which pertains to the financial year 2017-18. It is
                                     re-iterated that coal constitutes the major cost for manufacture of power, whereas
                                     air and water constitute a very negligible cost. The relevant extract to substanti-
                                     ate the above is as follows :

                                                         cost              Amount (INR in crores)  % of Total
                                             Cost of Coal                         1855           95.47%
                                             Cost of Oil                           3.83           0.2%
                                             Direct Expenses -                    36.91          1.90%
                                              Consumables Stores and Spares
                                              Repair and Maintenance
                                              Other Production overheads
                                             Utility Costs
                                             Water                                 7.51          0.39%
                                             Compressed Air                        1.29          0.07%
                                             Ash Handling System                  13.66          0.70%
                                             Circulating Water Intake             16.91          0.87%
                                             Sea Water Intake                      8.20          0.42%
                                             Power generation cost                1943           100%

                                            24.  Basis the above, the Appellant submits that coal and other inputs
                                     constitutes a major cost i.e. more than 95% of the total cost of materials that are
                                     required for generation of power. These are supplied by the Principal (i.e. JSL).
                                     The cost towards water and air does not exceed 05% of the cost of inputs, which
                                     is made  available by the  Job Worker  (i.e. the Appellant). These  charges, along
                                     with other expenses that are required for generation of power from coal are in
                                     any case included under the ambit of Job Work charges, chargeable by the Ap-
                                     pellant.
                                            25.  Seeing a reference to the above, the Appellant refers to the Appel-
                                     late Authority’s order, where, at paragraph 50, the decision of Prestige Engineer-
                                     ing (India) Limited v. Collector of C. Excise, Meerut [1994 (73) E.LT. 497 (S.C.)], has
                                     been referred. Further, the Ld. Appellate Authority has cited reference of a prin-
                                     ciple enumerated therein, which is reproduced as under :
                                            17. …………..
                                            The Concise Oxford Dictionary assigns several meanings to the expression
                                            ‘job’ but the relevant meaning having  regard to the present context is “a
                                            piece of work especially one done for hire or profit”. The expression ‘job
                                            work’ is assigned the following meaning : “work done  and paid for the
                                            job”. The Notification, it is evident, was conceived in the interest of small
                                            manufacturers undertaking job-works.  The idea behind  the Notification
                                            was to help the job-workers - persons who contributed mainly their labor
                                            and skill, though done with the help of tools, gadgets or machinery, as the
                                            case may be. The Notification was not intended to benefit those who con-
                                            tributed their  own material to the articles supplied by  the customer and
                                            manufactured different goods. We must hasten to add that addition or applica-
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      23rd April 2020      260
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145