Page 54 - GSTL_23rd April 2020_Vol 35_Part 4
P. 54

380                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 35
                                     were not entitled for the requisite, the Council was required to pass an order giv-
                                     ing reasons.
                                            25.  The  above directions are explicit, wherein, on a representation
                                     made by the petitioners the GST Council was required to issue requisite certifi-
                                     cate/recommendation in terms of para 12 of the judgment in the case of Jodhpur
                                     Truck Pvt. Ltd. (supra).
                                            26.  Para 12 of the judgment in the case of Jodhpur Truck Pvt. Ltd. (supra)
                                     reads as under :-
                                            “12.  A bare look at the above-quoted provisions leaves no room for ambi-
                                            guity that an assessee can be permitted to furnish offline GST TRAN-1 form
                                            subject to fulfilling all the three conditions, mentioned hereinfra :
                                                  (i)   the assessee failed to upload his GST TRAN-1 form on account
                                                      of technical glitches on the common portal; and
                                                  (ii)  such attempt was made during the currency of transitional pe-
                                                      riod i.e., 22-12-2017.
                                                  (iii)  the GST Council has made a recommendation for such exten-
                                                      sion, being satisfied about such failure.”
                                            27.  A perusal of the representations  made by the petitioners  (Annex-
                                     ure-14 in S.B.C.W.P. No. 440/2020 and Annexure-9 in S.B.C.W.P. No. 266/2020)
                                     would reveal that except for claiming the credit, the petitioners did not indicate
                                     any material to show that the petitioners had failed to upload their Form GST
                                     Tran-1 on account of technical glitches on the common portal and such an at-
                                     tempt was made during the currency of the transitional period as required by the
                                     judgment in the case of Jodhpur Truck Pvt. Ltd. (supra).
                                            28.  The GST Council dealt with the cases of the petitioners along with
                                     some other similarly situated petitioners and came to the following conclusion :-
                                            “2.  ITGRC is Committee constituted by GST Council to deal with such is-
                                            sues and in this regard on verification of the minutes of the ITGRC up to
                                            9th meeting following has been noticed with regard to said Writ Petitions :-

                                             Sr.  Writ Petition   Filed by             Remarks
                                             No.     No.
                                              4. 4752/2019   M/s.     Gaurav  B-1 Category, 3rd ITGRC meeting
                                                             Industries      held on 26-10-2018
                                              7.  4315/2019   M/s. Shree Motors  B-1 Category, 9th ITGRC meeting
                                                                             held on 2-12-2019

                                            3.  In view of above position it is clear that 9 cases (Sr. No. 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10,
                                            13, 14) were placed through  GSTN as  per C.B.I. & C. Circular dated 3-4-
                                            2018 before ITGRC and remaining 5 cases (Sr. No. 2, 3, 8, 11, 12) are not
                                            placed before the ITGRC till 9th ITGRC.
                                            4.  Out of above 9 cases presented by GSTN only one case (Sr. No. 14) was
                                            categorised under category A by GSTN which means error was faced by
                                            taxpayer while filing TRAN-1 on GST Portal. Other 8 cases were placed in
                                            category B by GSTN on the basis of systems log as no error was faced by
                                            the taxpayer while filing TRAN-1. Therefore, ITGRC has recommended on-
                                            ly one case (Sr. No. 14) to reopen the portal and in remaining 8 cases not al-
                                            lowed to re-open the GST Portal. In case any new facts has emerged in view
                                            of Para 2 above, in these cases, the same may be brought to the notice of this
                                            office.
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      23rd April 2020      174
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59