Page 226 - GSTL_30th April 2020_Vol 35_Part 5
P. 226

696                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 35
                                     Registration (Contd.)
                                     —  separately when not required to be  taken in the  State where  port of
                                        clearance of import goods located - See under PLACE OF SUPPLY  ...... 424
                                     — under GST - Cancellation thereof - Default in filing returns - Continuous
                                        default of six months - Tabular statement filed by petitioner as verified
                                        by  Department confirming that while at time of issuance of SCN  for
                                        cancellation of registration, there was indeed a continuous default of six
                                        months in filing returns - However, on same date when order of
                                        cancellation  was issued, petitioner had  filed return in the morning in
                                        respect of one first month - Thus, on date of issuing cancellation order
                                        default in filing return was for continuous period of five months and not
                                        six months - Officer passing cancellation order cannot be faulted as,
                                        return having been filed online, he was not aware of it nor did petitioner
                                        inform immediately or thereafter about filing of return for one month -
                                        Since said continuous default of six months is required not only at stage
                                        of issuing SCN but also at stage of issuing cancellation order, impugned
                                        order quashed - However, Department at liberty to take any other action
                                        as per law for such default and also at liberty to initiate cancellation
                                        proceedings as and when default subsequently becomes continuous for
                                        six months - Section 29(2)(c) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
                                        - Article 226  of Constitution of India —  Phoenix Rubbers  v. Commercial Tax
                                        Officer, SGST Deptt., Palakkad (Ker.) .............................  8
                                     Reimbursable expenses,  Service Tax not leviable - See under COST
                                        REIMBURSEMENT ................................. 202
                                     Release of goods and vehicle detained/seized in transit, procedure thereof -
                                        See under DETENTION/SEIZURE  ........................  67
                                     — and vehicle on simple Bond detained for paying CGST/SGST instead of
                                        IGST on inter-state trade - See under DETENTION   ...............  78
                                     — on  inter-State supply detained on the ground of  misclassification - See
                                        under DETENTION ................................. 545
                                     — Provisional release of goods detained under GST allowed by furnishing
                                        Bank Guarantee only - See under DETENTION  ................. 399
                                     — Vehicle found in wrong destination, detention of tax paid goods not
                                        sustainable, tax paid again for getting release of goods to be refunded -
                                        See under DETENTION  .............................. 257
                                     Remuneration to Directors  is taxable under GST under RCM - See under
                                        SERVICES ...................................... 580
                                     Renting of Immovable  Property service  - Acquisition of land by
                                        Government  of Rajasthan (GoR) undertaking for setting up  of thermal
                                        power plant as per agreement entered into with M/s. Raj West Power
                                        Limited (RWPL) - Separate Implementation Agreement signed between
                                        GoR and RWPL for implementation, operation and maintenance of
                                        lignite based thermal power plant and Joint Venture unit (JV) by name of
                                        Barmer Lignite Mining Co. Limited  (BLMCL) formed for carrying  out
                                        lignite mining - JV company not given title of land and request for
                                        transfer  of land, rejected - Demand raised on payment made towards
                                        acquisition of land treating same to be made for transfer  of  surface  right
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      30th April 2020      226
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231