Page 94 - GSTL_30th April 2020_Vol 35_Part 5
P. 94

580                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 35

                                              2020 (35) G.S.T.L. 580 (A.A.R. - GST - Raj.)
                                        BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UNDER GST,
                                                                   RAJASTHAN
                                             S/Shri J.P. Meena, Member (Central Tax) and Hemant Jain,
                                                                Member (State Tax)
                                                   IN RE : CLAY CRAFT INDIA PVT. LTD.

                                               Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2019-20/33, dated 20-2-2020
                                            Services supplied by director - Remuneration to Directors - Considera-
                                     tion paid to the Directors in relation to services provided by them to company
                                     and not covered under clause (1) of the Schedule III to Central Goods and Ser-
                                     vices Tax Act, 2017 as Directors not the employee of the Company - Company
                                     located in taxable territory and Directors’ remuneration paid for services sup-
                                     plied by Director to company - Liable to tax under reverse charge mechanism
                                     in terms of Serial No. 6 of Notification No. 13/2017-C.T. (Rate) - Sections 2(31),
                                     2(93) and 9(3) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. [paras 5.7, 5.8, 5.9]
                                                                                Ruling in favour of department
                                                                  CASES CITED
                                     Alcon Consulting Engineers (I) Pvt. Ltd.
                                         — 2019 (30) G.S.T.L. 678 (A.A.R. - GST) — Relied on ...................................................... [Paras 1.5, 1.7]
                                     Ram Pershad v. Commissioner of Income Tax — AIR 1973 SC 637 — Referred ......................... [Para 1.37]
                                     Regional Director, E.S.I. v. Sarathi Lines (P) Ltd. — 1997 (1998) ILLJ 28 Ker — Referred ......... [Para 1.36]
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      Shri Madhu Sudan Sharma, Authorised Representa-
                                                                  tive, for the assessee.
                                            [Order]. - At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provi-
                                     sions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain
                                     provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar
                                     provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same
                                     provision under the RGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the purposes
                                     of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision under the CGST
                                     Act/RGST Act would be mentioned as being under the “GST Act”.
                                            The issue raised by M/s. Clay Craft India Pvt. Ltd., F-766A, F-766, Road No.
                                     1D, VKI Area,  Jaipur,  Rajasthan 302013  (hereinafter the applicant) is  fit to pro-
                                     nounce advance ruling as it falls under the ambit of the Section 97(2)(e) given as
                                     under :-
                                            (e)  Determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or
                                            both;
                                     Further, the applicant being a registered person (GSTIN is 08AAACC6866D1ZO
                                     as per the declaration given by him in Form ARA-01) the issue raised by the ap-
                                     plicant is neither pending for proceedings nor proceedings were passed by any
                                     authority. Based on the above observations, the applicant is  admitted to pro-
                                     nounce advance ruling.
                                            1.  Submission and interpretation of the applicant :
                                            1.1  The applicant is engaged in the manufacture of bone China Crock-
                                     ery, Transfer Sheet Decalcomania, other Utensils Item and Moulds & Die falling
                                     under Chapter Heading No. 6911 10 11, 4908 10 00, 8480 10 00 & 8480 10 00 of the
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      30th April 2020      94
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99