Page 25 - GSTL_21st May 2020_Vol 36_Part 3
P. 25

2020 ]                      INDEX - 21st May, 2020                  xxiii
               Value of supply - Freight and insurance charges - Mode of delivery being by
                  road on freight pre-paid door-delivery basis, applicant has to transport
                  the goods and deliver the power packs to the recipient - Hence, freight
                  and insurance charges are  part of the value of supply of power packs,
                  supply contract being a contract for supply of power packs and the value
                  of the contract is the sum total of the value of power pack plus all charges
                  charged to the recipient for anything done till goods  are delivered to
                  recipient - Supply of power packs and supply of freight and insurance
                  services involved in such power packs to be treated as “supply of power
                  packs” and applicable tax related to such power packs and the time of
                  supply would apply to the entire transaction as it applies to the “supply
                  of power packs” — In Re : San Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. (A.A.R. - GST - Kar.) . .   406
               VAT Assessment under  Fast Track  - Reopening thereof - Limitation -
                  Impugned order levying additional tax and penalty issued by reopening
                  assessment completed 14 years ago under fast track assessment scheme -
                  Merely because said scheme’s provisions did not mention any limitation
                  period, does not mean that general limitation provisions for escaped
                  assessment (5 years) would not be applicable - Even otherwise,
                  assessment  under said scheme could  have been reopened only on
                  emergence of additional material which is not forthcoming in this case -
                  In view of aforesaid, impugned order of reassessment quashed - Sections
                  17 and 19 of Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963  - Article 226 of
                  Constitution  of India —  K. Sasilal  v.  Fast  Track Assessment Team, SGST  Deptt.,
                  Alappuzha (Ker.) ....................................  326
               Vegetables - Leguminous vegetables - Parched/puffed gram - Product also
                  referred commercially as fried grams  and “Hurigadale” or “Putani” in
                  Kannada - Product obtained by drying and puffing of Bengal gram seeds
                  by applying dry heat - Process not involving use of salt or oil - C.B.I. & C.
                  Circular  No.  113/32/2019-GST, dated 11-10-2019 clearly stating such
                  products would be classified under HSN Code 0713 - Product attract GST
                  @ 5% in terms  of S. No. 25 of  Notification No. 1/2017-C.T. (Rate) if
                  branded and packed in unit containers - And exempted from GST in all
                  other cases in terms of Serial No. 45 of Notification No. 2/2017-C.T.
                  (Rate) — In Re : Sri Bhagyalakshmi Trading Corporation (A.A.R. - GST - Kar.) ........  380
               Vehicle entry fees - Collection of vehicle entry fees, classification and rate of
                  GST - See under SUPPLY OF SERVICE ......................  435
               Works Contract services  as composite supply, taxability of - See  under
                  COMPOSITE SUPPLY ...............................  467
               Writ jurisdiction - Condonation of delay in filing appeal - When Statute is
                  clear about the limitation, High Court cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to
                  direct appellate authority to entertain appeal - Article 226 of Constitution
                  of India — Debabrata Mishra v. Commissioner of Central Tax and GST (Ori.) ........  325
               — Maintainability - Existence of alternative statutory remedy - Appeal to
                  Commissioner (Appeals) -  Limitation - Condonation of delay in filing
                  appeal - Powers of High Court - Writ petition after expiry of limitation
                  period for filing appeal to challenge  assessment order - Appeal to
                  Commissioner (Appeals) filed after  prescribed limitation period
                  dismissed as  delay in filing appeal  not satisfactorily  explained - High
                  Court could not have condoned delay by allowing  writ petition filed
                  thereafter - High Court cannot disregard statutory period for redressal of
                  grievance and entertain writ petition as matter of course - That High
                  Court had wide powers not to mean that it would issue writ  inconsistent
                                     GST LAW TIMES      21st May 2020      25
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30