Page 16 - GSTL_11th June 2020_Vol 37_Part 2
P. 16

xiv                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 37
                                     Interest for delayed payment of Service Tax when not justified - See under
                                        CENVAT ....................................... 219
                                     — on delayed refund - Not granted as assessee failed to take effective steps
                                        subsequent to order passed by assessing authority - Once refund order
                                        made, necessarily interest must follow - Direction to Authorities to pay
                                        interest as applicable for relevant period - Section 11BB of Central Excise
                                        Act, 1944 as applicable to Service Tax vide Section 83 of Finance Act, 1994
                                        — Sujaya D. Alva v. Commissioner of C. Ex. & S.T., Mangaluru (Kar.) ............ 147
                                     Interpretation of Statute  -  Sealing of premises - Statutory provisions, i.e.,
                                        Section 67 of  Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 providing  that
                                        sealing has to be resorted only if access to premises is denied - Any other
                                        reason cannot be ground for resorting to sealing of premises - Section 67
                                        of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Article 226 of Constitution
                                        of India — Anopsinh Kiritsinh Sarvaiya v. State of Gujarat (Guj.) .............. 171
                                     — Search and seizure under GST - Section 67 of Central Goods and Services
                                        Tax Act, 2017 empowering proper officer, not  below the rank of Joint
                                        Commissioner, to either search himself  or authorized search  by other
                                        subordinate officer on reasons to believe that goods liable to confiscation
                                        or documents relevant to enquiry are secreted at any place and to seize
                                        such goods/documents - Said provision also empowers the authorized
                                        officer to seal or break open door of any premises where access to such
                                        premise is denied - Section 67 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act,
                                        2017 - Article 226 of Constitution of India — Anopsinh Kiritsinh Sarvaiya v. State
                                        of Gujarat (Guj.) ..................................... 171
                                     Interpretational issue,  extended period  of limitation  not invocable - See
                                        under DEMAND  .................................. 210
                                     Joint venture with income sharing arrangement, relationship is not that of
                                        service provider/recipient - See under RENTING  OF IMMOVABLE
                                        PROPERTY SERVICE ................................ 236
                                     Jurisdiction - Inspection, search and seizure - Form GST INS-03, which deals
                                        with the order of Prohibition, issued to proprietor of MAT Parcel Service
                                        premises under Section 67(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
                                        by an officer, i.e., 1st respondent-Deputy Assistant Commissioner  (ST)
                                        without any written authorization - Power of inspection under Section 67
                                        ibid being specified to an officer  not below the rank  of Joint
                                        Commissioner, order passed by respondent No. 1, without reference to
                                        the order of authorization in writing, is illegal and without jurisdiction —
                                        Mahendra Kumar Indermal v. Dy. Asstt. Commr. (ST), Vijayawada (A.P.) ........... 168
                                     Law on the point not clear, extended period of limitation not invocable - See
                                        under DEMAND  .................................. 210
                                     Limitation for appeal - Delay when condonable not condonable - See under
                                        APPEAL ....................................... 235
                                     Limitation for demand - Extended period when applicable/inapplicable  -
                                        See under DEMAND  .....................  189, 210, 240, 242, 246
                                     Limitation for refund - See under REFUND/REFUND CLAIM  .......... 185
                                     Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency service  -  Taxability after 16-6-
                                        2005 when same provided by an individual or proprietorship concern -
                                        As per amended definition of Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency

                                                           GST LAW TIMES      11th June 2020      16
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21