Page 69 - GSTL_11th June 2020_Vol 37_Part 2
P. 69

2020 ]     JAGANATHAN ENGINEERING WORKS v. CGST NODAL OFFICER        155
               payable and as to the liability of the employer/awarder to satisfy the same, it is
               open for the respondents to consider the quotes made by the bidders including
               the petitioner (treating the same as excluding the GST) as nobody has claimed it
               to be inclusive of the GST and further when the tender conditions stipulate that it
               has to be excluding the GST. It is also open for the respondent-company, if they
               so desire, to go  for re-tender,  giving proper clarification  in this regard  and
               providing necessary column for making the entries in the web portal showing
               the different works (Section-B and  Section-C separately) with reference to the
               rate of tax payable.
                       18.  The writ petition stands allowed. No costs.

                                                _______

                                 2020 (37) G.S.T.L. 155 (Mad.)
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                         [MADURAI BENCH]
                                          C.V. Karthikeyan, J.
                            JAGANATHAN ENGINEERING WORKS

                                                Versus
                                                  CGST NODAL OFFICER
                 CGST NODAL OFFICER FOR IT GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL,
                                             CHENNAI
                             W.P. (MD) No. 4045 of 2020, decided on 10-3-2020
                       GSTN portal - Technical glitches in filing GST Forms electronically -
               Date of submitting declaration electronically in Form GST TRAN-1 by
               assessee to be extended - Rule 97A of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules,
               2017. [paras 4, 5]
                                                                        Petition allowed
                                             CASE CITED
               Angamuthu Amuthavel v. Commercial Tax Officer — W.P. (MD) No. 21320 of 2019,
                    decided on 14-10-2019 by Madras High Court — Relied on ...................................................... [Para 4]
                       REPRESENTED BY :     Shri J. Prasanna Kumar, for the Petitioner.
                                            S/Shri  S.  Jeyasingh, CGSC and R.  Aravindan,
                                            Standing Counsel, for the Respondent.
                       [Order]. - The Writ Petition is filed in the nature of mandamus seeking a
               direction to open the online portal so as to enable the petitioner to again file the
               rectified TRAN-1 form or in the alternative to accept his application manually
               with necessary correction on or before 31-3-2020 to claim transitional credit.
                       2.  The petitioner is a proprietorship company having its office and fac-
               tory at Trichy, engaged in the manufacturing of boiler components to the BHEL
               and other major heavy engineering industries. It is registered with the Excise
               Department and under the Central Excise Act, 1944. It is also registered with the
               [Central] Goods and  Services [Tax]  Act, 2017 (CGST Act) with Reg.  No.
               33AAEPN4703D1Z9 with  effect from 1-7-2017. The registration certificate was
               issued in Fort GST REG-06, dated 2-8-2017. It is an assessee in the office of the
                                     GST LAW TIMES      11th June 2020      69
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74