Page 148 - GSTL_18th June 2020_Vol 37_Part 3
P. 148

362                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 37
                                     and failed to avail the opportunities of personal hearing provided to them in the
                                     present appeal. In the circumstances, there is no other alternative except to dis-
                                     pose off the appeal on merits considering the material/information available in
                                     the appeal file.
                                     Statement of facts :-
                                            4.  The appellant is  an  assessee on the rolls of the  AA  and  doing the
                                     business of supplying the security services.
                                            5.  The A.A stated in his assessment orders (GST assessment 13), which
                                     were passed separately for each month from January, 2019 to February, 2019, that
                                     the appellant has been filing the returns in Form GSTR-1 by declaring the out-
                                     ward taxable supplies  under the GST Act, but not filed the returns in  Form
                                     GSTR-3B for the above tax periods, and not paid liable tax on its outward sup-
                                     plies as declared in the returns in Form GSTR-1.
                                            The A.A stated that he has issued notices for filing of the returns in Form
                                     GSTR-3B, but the appellant failed to file the same. As per the A.A’s remarks, he is
                                     left with no other option, but to resorted to pass the best judgment assessment
                                     orders  under Section  62 of CGST/SGST  Act, 2017.  The A.A has estimated the
                                     appellant’s outward taxable supplies, by enhancing the returned outward taxa-
                                     ble supplies in the returns in Form GSTR-1 by 50% towards probable supplies.
                                     Thus, the A.A has best judged the turnovers of the appellant @ 150% of the re-
                                     turned outward supplies and levied tax thereon @ 18%. The A.A also invoked
                                     Section 50 and computed the interest liability of the appellant.
                                            6.  Besides, the A.A also levied penalty @ 100% under Section 122 hold-
                                     ing that the appellant has wilfully suppressed such 150% of the returned turno-
                                     vers in Form GSTR-1, in such default. The details of such total tax, interest and
                                     penalty levied are given below in the table.

                                      Month    SGST     SGST      CGST     CGST    IGST     IGST    Penalty
                                                       Interest           Interest         Interest   100%
                                      Jan.-19  81,81,365  2,53,622  81,81,365  2,53,622  11,64,134  36,088  1,75,26,864
                                      Feb.-19  78,50,158  1,33,453  78,50,158  1,33,453  11,69,252  19,877  1,68,69,568
                                      Total   1,60,31,523  3,87,075 1,60,31,523  3,87,075  23,33,386  55,965  3,43,96,432
                                      Amt.

                                            7.  Thus, the A.A has  levied the tax,  penalty  and  interest as detailed
                                     hereunder :
                                             Tax     Rs.  3,43,96,432/-
                                             Penalty Rs. 3,43,96,432/-
                                             Interest Rs. 8,30,115/-
                                             Total   Rs. 6,96,22,979/-
                                            8.  Aggrieved by the above orders passed by the assessing authority, the
                                     appellant has preferred the present appeal and disputed the levy of tax, penalty
                                     and interest totalling to an amount of Rs. 6,96,22,979/-.
                                     Grounds of Appeal :-
                                            9.  The grounds of appeal filed by appellant in the appeal are extracted
                                     hereunder;
                                            (1)   Appellant submits that the impugned order is ex facie illegal and un-
                                                  tenable in law since the same is contrary to facts and judicial deci-
                                                  sions.
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      18th June 2020      148
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153