Page 176 - GSTL_18th June 2020_Vol 37_Part 3
P. 176

390                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 37
                                     ing not a “Government entity”, service supplied by applicant not covered un-
                                     der clause (vi) of Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 11/2017-C.T. (Rate) as amend-
                                     ed but covered under the residual Item No. (xii) of Serial No. 3 ibid and taxa-
                                     ble at 9% CGST and 9% KGST. [paras 5.9, 7]
                                            Government entity - National Centre for Biological Sciences  (NCBS)
                                     neither set up by an Act of Parliament or State Legislature nor established by
                                     any Government - Further the Council which administers this institute having
                                     only four members appointed by Government and hence the Government not
                                     having more than 90% control over it - Also, the said institute not established
                                     to carry out a function entrusted by the Government - Hence, for all these rea-
                                     sons, NCBS is not “Government Entity” as per clause (x) of paragraph 4 of No-
                                     tification No. 11/2017-C.T. (Rate). [para 5.7]
                                                                                   Ruling in favour of assessee
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      Smt. Seethalakshmi, Chartered  Accountant and
                                                                  Authorised Representative, for the Assessee.
                                            [Order]. -  M/s. Hombale Constructions and Estates Private Limited,
                                     (hereinafter referred as ‘applicant’), having GSTIN : 29AADCH4357B1ZQ, filed
                                     an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with
                                     Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and under Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017
                                     read with Rule 104 of the KGST Rules, 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging
                                     the fee of Rs. 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the KGST Act.
                                            2.  The Applicant is a Private Limited Company incorporated under the
                                     Companies Act, 1956 and entered into a works contract agreement with National
                                     Centre for Biological Sciences for construction of Hostel building at NCBS Cam-
                                     pus in Bangalore. The applicant has sought advance ruling in respect of the fol-
                                     lowing question :
                                            Whether  applicant should charge GST @  12% for service provided to
                                            NCBS as per Notification No.  24/2017-Central Tax  (Rate), dated 21-9-
                                            2017?
                                            3.  Relavent facts of the case
                                            (a)  The applicant states that he has  entered  into a  works contract
                                                 agreement with National Centre for Biological Sciences for construc-
                                                 tion of Hostel building at NCBS Campus in Bangalore.
                                            (b)  The National Centre for Biological Sciences (hereinafter referred to
                                                 as “NCBS”) began as a separate centre of Tata Institute of Funda-
                                                 mental  Research (hereinafter referred to as TIFR)  which receives
                                                 grants from the Department of Atomic Energy, Government of In-
                                                 dia. The applicant states that the idea that TIFR should start a Cen-
                                                 tre for Biological Research following a suggestion by the then Direc-
                                                 tor of Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore and that joint TIFR-IISc
                                                 Centre could be located on the IISc Campus. In 1984, the Planning
                                                 Commission  of Government of India  agreed to  fund a centre for
                                                 fundamental research in  biological sciences at Bangalore  and the
                                                 centre was to function as “an autonomous body under the aegis of
                                                 TIFR and conduct fundamental research and teaching in areas of bi-
                                                 ology at the frontiers of knowledge”. It was to be grown around a
                                                 group of outstanding individuals and  not according to a  “rigidly
                                                          GST LAW TIMES      18th June 2020      176
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181