Page 13 - GSTL_16th July 2020_Vol. 38_Part 3
P. 13

2020 ]                      INDEX - 16th July, 2020                    xi
                  representations to various authorities immediately thereafter and action
                  taken on response to some of them including filing Manual return in
                  terms of Courts order in earlier writ petition, did not result in solution -
                  Much later, petitioner was informed to follow C.B.E. & C. Circular No.
                  26/26/2017-GST, dated 29-12-2017 in which it has been specified that a
                  taxpayer may adjust amount not paid or short-paid  or excess paid in
                  GSTR-3B with return  of subsequent periods and, inter alia, pay any
                  liability with interest -  Petitioner immediately, adjusted amount
                  deposited in August, 2017 in return of September,  2019 which  was
                  credited in Government account in October, 2019 - Clearly delay in credit
                  of GST in Government Account is not the fault of petitioner who had
                  approached department immediately when amount paid by him was not
                  reflecting in  Electronic Liability Register -  It was  Department which
                  could not provide immediate remedial measures -  Undisputedly, all
                  along this period amount deposited was lying in designated bank and
                  petitioner has not been utilized it for his own purpose - In view of above,
                  amount credited in Government Account in October, 2019 is deemed to
                  have discharged GST liability as due in August, 2017 - No interest
                  demandable from petitioner for delay in credit to Government account -
                  Impugned communication of demand of interest, set aside - Section 39 of
                  Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Article 226 of Constitution of
                  India — Vishnu Aroma Pouching Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (Guj.) .............  289
               Interpretation of statute - Reasonable interpretation — In Re : Safset Agencies Pvt.
                  Ltd. (App. A.A.R. - GST - Mah.) .............................  421
               Invoice accompanying vehicle, detention and seizure of goods in transit on
                  the ground of undervaluation not sustainable - See under DETENTION  ...  317
               Isabgol - Classification and rate of GST - See under PSYLLIUM HUSK
                  POWDER ......................................  329
               Isabgol husk powder - Rate of GST on Psyllium/Isabgol husk powder - See
                  under PSYLLIUM HUSK POWDER  .......................  329
               Jurisdiction  - AAR has no jurisdiction  on questions  relating to place of
                  supply - See under ADVANCE RULING AUTHORITY  ............  393
               — AAR has no jurisdiction on questions relating to place of supply - See
                  under ADVANCE RULING ............................  409
               Land’s plotted development,  taxability under GST - See under
                  CONSTRUCTION SERVICE ............................  352
               Limitation for appeal - Delay when condonable not condonable - See under
                  APPEAL .......................................  362
               Margin scheme for taxability of second hand goods under GST, scope of -
                  See under VALUATION (GST)  ..........................  421
               Materials  sold by service  provider to service  recipient, scope  of exclusion
                  from value of services - See under VALUATION (SERVICE TAX) .......  298
               Mehendi powder,  classification and rate of GST - See under  HENNA
                  POWDER ......................................  335
               Merchant Trade  transaction  - Movement of goods from  one country to
                  another - Transaction by  India based trader - Taxability under GST -
                  Goods would be directly shipped by vendor outside India to customer
                  located outside India; payment would  be made in foreign currency to
                  vendor and applicant would receive  foreign currency  from customer -
                  Goods liable to duty only when they are  imported  into  India  and  IGST
                                     GST LAW TIMES      16th July 2020      13
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18