Page 21 - GSTL_16th July 2020_Vol. 38_Part 3
P. 21

A DIRECTOR AND HIS GST LIABILITY
               By
               V. Srikanth
               ADVOCATE

                       Top managers worry whether the services pro-
               vided by a director of a company or a body corporate to
               the company or the body corporate can be subjected to tax
               under the CGST Act and, if so, whether the tax is payable
               by the company or body corporate on reverse charge ba-
               sis  as per the Notification No. 13/2017, dated  28-6-2017
               issued by the Government of India. This article explores this issue.
                       Clause (1) of Schedule-III to the CGST Act provides that the services by
               an employee to the employer in the course of or in relation to his employment
               shall be treated as activities or transactions which are neither a supply of goods
               nor a supply of services. The consequence of an activity specified in the Sched-
               ule-III is that the activity is not taxable under the Act.
                       The question that arises  for consideration is whether the director of  a
               company can be regarded as an employee of the company notwithstanding the
               notification issued by the Government of India directing the recipient of the ser-
               vices to pay tax on reverse charge basis. If the director of a company can be re-
               garded as an employee of the company then it follows that tax cannot be levied
               under the Act since the activity falls under clause (1) of Schedule-III to the CGST
               Act.
                       Recently, in 2020 (35) G.S.T.L. 580 (A.A.R. - GST - Raj.) (In Re : Clay Craft
               India Private Limited, Rajasthan), the Advance Ruling Authority at Rajasthan, had
               taken the view that as per Notification No. 13/2017, dated 28-6-2017, the consid-
               eration paid to the directors of the company shall be subject to tax on reverse
               charge basis. The  advance ruling  authority simply  held the directors were not
               employees of the company. The advance ruling authority at Karnataka, in 2019
               (30) G.S.T.L. 678 (AAR - GST), (In Re : Alcon Consulting Engineers (I) Private Lim-
               ited), had taken an identical view, relying on the aforesaid notification.
                       The above advance ruling authorities had not referred to an earlier deci-
                                     GST LAW TIMES      16th July 2020      21
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26