Page 93 - GSTL_23rd July 2020_Vol 38_Part 4
P. 93

2020 ]           TEAM HR SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA        459
                       [Order per : Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. (Via Video Conferencing)]. - This
               petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks mandamus, directing
               the Assistant Commissioner, Central Tax, GST- Delhi East, GST Division, to
               forthwith refund with interest,  “pre-deposit” of Rs. 2,38,00,000/- made by the
               petitioner; it is stated that the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order
               dated 3rd October, 2011 passed by the Commissioner, has been finally allowed
               by the Tribunal by order dated 22nd February, 2018 [2018 (13) G.S.T.L. 163 (Tri-
               bunal)] and revenue appeal preferred whereagainst by the respondents to this
               Court i.e. SERTA No. 23/2018 [2019 (25) G.S.T.L. 207 (Del.)], has been dismissed
               on 24th August, 2018, declaring that the respondents had no right to retain the
               said money of the petitioner.
                       2.  It is the case of the petitioner, (i)  that an audit/investigation was
               conducted by the officers of the Service Tax Commissionerate, New Delhi, from
               24th July, 2006 to 28th July, 2006, for the period 1st July, 2003 to 31st March, 2005
               and a deposit of Rs. 2,38,00,000/- was made by the petitioner on 27th October,
               2006, under  protest, under  pressure  from the officers during the  au-
               dit/investigation of the service tax records, as the officers insisted on the deposit
               by the petitioner, even without issuing any notice to show cause to the petitioner;
               (ii) that the petitioner, vide letter dated 30th October, 2006, informed the re-
               spondents that the deposit made on 27th October, 2006 was under protest and
               vide letter dated 26th February, 2007, informed the Joint Commissioner of Ser-
               vice Tax of the same and that despite lapse of a few months from the date of de-
               posit, a show cause notice had not been received; (iii) that the Service Tax De-
               partment issued a show cause notice dated 28th July, 2008 to the petitioner, de-
               manding service tax of Rs. 4,66,39,061/- for the period of 1st July, 2003 to 31st
               March, 2005, admitting that the petitioner [sic] had already  deposited Rs.
               2,38,00,000/-  under protest on 27th October, 2006;  (iv) that the Commissioner
               (Adjudication) Service Tax, New Delhi passed the order dated 3 October, 2011 in
               respect of the show cause notice dated 28th July, 2008 aforesaid, confirming the
               demand with interest and penalty  and appropriated the  amount of Rs.
               2,38,00,000/- aforesaid towards the same; (v) that the petitioner preferred an ap-
               peal before the Customs, Excise  &  Service Tax  Appellate Tribunal
               (CESTAT)/Tribunal along with an application for interim stay; the Tribunal by
               order dated  24th  September,  2012  allowed the stay application,  by waiving of
               pre-deposit of the balance amount owing to deposit by the petitioner, though
               under protest, of the said sum of  Rs.  2,38,00,000/-  and vide  subsequent order
               dated 15th October, 2013, it was clarified that the stay would continue to operate
               till the pendency of the appeal; (vi) that vide Circular No. 984/08/2014-CX, dat-
               ed 16th September, 2014 issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, De-
               partment of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, it was clarified that when an appeal is
               decided in favour of the assessee, the assessee is entitled to refund of amount
               with interest under Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and such refund
               should be made within fifteen days of receipt of letter seeking refund, irrespec-
               tive of whether the Department was proposing to challenge the said order; (vii)
               that vide Master Circular No. 1053/02/2017-CX, dated 10th March, 2017 issued
               by the Board, it has further been clarified that when an appeal is decided in fa-
               vour of  assessee, the  assessee is entitled  for  refund of the amount deposited
               along with interest, from the date of making deposit till the date of refund and
               such deposit is not payment of duty and will not be governed by the provisions
               of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act; (viii) that the Tribunal, vide final order
               dated 22nd February, 2018 allowed the appeal aforesaid of the petitioner, on the

                                     GST LAW TIMES      23rd July 2020      93
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98