Page 77 - GSTL_6th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 1
P. 77

2020 (39) G.S.T.L. 3 (Mad.)

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                            A.P. Sahi, CJ. and Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
                                    P.R. MANI ELECTRONICS
                                                Versus
                                         UNION OF INDIA
                        Writ Petition No. 8890 of 2020 and W.M.P. No. 10803 of 2020,
                                          decided on 13-7-2020
                       Input Tax  Credit under  GST - Transitional  provisions  -  Rule 117  of
               Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 - Vires of - Availment of input tax
               credit under Section 140(1) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is a
               concession attached with conditions of its exercise within the time-limit and
               not an accrued right - Input tax credit is not without time-limit under the GST
               regime, also - Prescribing a time-limit under the impugned Rule is not contra-
               ry to the object of the Act - Time-limit to be regarded as mandatory as it im-
               pacts substantive rights  of parties -  Time-limit stipulated in  Rule  117 ibid
               within rule-making power conferred in Section 164(2) ibid - Thus, limit under
               Rule 117(1) ibid is not ultra vires of the Act. [paras 16, 17, 18]
                       Input Tax Credit under GST - Transitional provisions - Return in Form
               GST TRAN-1 required  to be filed  electronically  on the common portal  but
               handed over in person  to Sales Tax Collection Inspector, Tiruvannamalai -
               Consequently, Petitioner completely failed to make out a case to direct the Re-
               spondents to permit  the  Petitioner  to file  Form GST TRAN-1  and claim  the
               Transitional ITC -  However, if  any dispensations  are granted  by the tax  au-
               thorities with regard to availing of Transitional ITC, whether by filing Form
               GST TRAN-1 or otherwise, and to which the Petitioner may be entitled, this
               order will  not preclude the Petitioner from making a claim for Transitional
               ITC. [para 19]
                                                                      Petition dismissed
                                             CASES CITED
               ALD Automotive Pvt. Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer
                    — 2018 (364) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) — Relied on ............................................................................. [Paras 10, 14]
               Bachhan Devi v. Nagar Nigam — (2008) 12 SCC 372 — Relied on ................................................... [Para 18]
                                    GST LAW TIMES      6th August 2020      77
                                                  777
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82