Page 46 - GSTL_13th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 2
P. 46

132                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 39
                                     same would  not result in the forfeiture of the rights, in case the credit is not
                                     availed within the period prescribed.  This, however, does not  mean that the
                                     availing of Cenvat credit can be in perpetuity. Transitory provisions, as the word
                                     indicates have to be given its due meaning. Transition from pre-GST Regime to
                                     GST Regime has not been smooth and therefore, what was reasonable in ideal
                                     circumstances is not in the current situation. In absence of any specific provisions
                                     under the Act, we would have to hold that in terms of the residuary provisions
                                     of the Limitation Act, the period of three years should be the guiding principle
                                     and thus a period of three years from the appointed date would be the maximum
                                     period for availing of such  credit.  The  petitioner has attempted  to  file  TRAN
                                     within the time-limit framed under the  Rule. In the context of what has been
                                     stated discussed above, this Court directs the respondent authorities to reopen
                                     the Form TRAN-2 or accept manual filing of GST TRAN-2 to allow the petitioner
                                     to claim transitional credit held in stock as on the appointed date after proper
                                     verification including the invoices submitted by the petitioner. It is made hereby
                                     clear that such exercise has to be completed within 30-6-2020 so as to enable the
                                     petitioner to submit his GST TRAN-2.
                                            8.  Thus the writ application being WP No. 5585(W)/2020 is disposed
                                     of. Consequently, the connected application being  CAN No. 3323 of  2020 also
                                     stands disposed of.
                                                                     _______

                                                        2020 (39) G.S.T.L. 132 (Del.)

                                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
                                                        Manmohan and Sanjeev Narula, JJ.
                                                                     BINTY
                                                                      Versus
                                                              UNION OF INDIA
                                      W.P. (C) No. 3187 of 2020 and CM Appl. No. 11076 of 2020, decided on 19-5-2020
                                            Consumer Welfare Fund under Indirect Taxation - Scope of utilization
                                     - Applicability of utilization guidelines  to  amounts  lying unclaimed with
                                     Banks/Insurance Companies, etc. - Said Fund, created under various indirect
                                     taxation laws with rules framed from time to time for utilization of amount, is
                                     used for giving  financial  assistance to  various Universities, Voluntary  Con-
                                     sumer Organization (VCOs) and States to promote and protect welfare  and
                                     interests of consumers, create consumer awareness and strengthen consumer
                                     movement - Thus, Government is fully aware of scope of utilization of amount
                                     - Accordingly, petitioners plea of giving same treatment to unutilized and un-
                                     claimed amounts lying with Cooperative Banks, Insurance Companies, etc is
                                     without any basis as it is not established that said amounts lying with them
                                     are in jeopardy - Secondly Banks, Insurance companies, etc. are regulated by
                                     their own set of rules  and regulatory  authorities, e.g., RBI/IRDA  -  These
                                     amounts are duly accounted for in books of accounts and utilized as per set
                                     norms under proper Audit - Petitioner’s plea of misuse of such funds not well
                                     founded for Court to give directions as desired by petitioner - Article 226 of
                                     Constitution of India. [paras 9, 10]

                                                          GST LAW TIMES      13th August 2020      46
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51