Page 57 - GSTL_13th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 2
P. 57

2020 ]             MANGLA HOIST P. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA            143
               custody  documents  are seized under  sub-section  (2)  shall be entitled to make
               copies thereof.” Unfortunately, till date  the appellant/petitioner failed to  avail
               that opportunity.
                       7.  Considering the above discussion in our considered view there is no
               ambiguity or illegality or infirmity in the impugned order. However, we direct
               the appellant/petitioner to take steps in terms of Section 67 sub-section (5) under
               Chapter XIV of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, if he is so advised.
               If the appellant/petitioner takes steps as per said sub-section (5) of Section 67
               under Chapter XIV of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, then the
               respondent No. 3 is directed to allow the appellant/petitioner to make copies of
               the seized documents by 13th July, 2020 subject to compliance of statutory for-
               malities.
                       8.  With this direction the appeal  along with the applications being
               CAN 3513 of 2020 and CAN 3526 of 2020 is disposed of.
                       9.  The appellant/petitioner is directed to give written reply to the show
               cause notice by 20th July, 2020.
                       10.  Urgent photostat certified copy of this judgment, if applied for, be
               given to the Learned Advocate for the parties on usual undertakings.
                                                _______
                                  2020 (39) G.S.T.L. 143 (Del.)

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
                               Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
                                     MANGLA HOIST P. LTD.
                                                Versus
                                         UNION OF INDIA
                W.P. (C) No. 3572 of 2020 and CM Appl. No. 12707 of 2020, decided on 17-6-2020
                       Input Tax Credit - Transitional credit - Filing of Form GST TRAN-1 -
               Technical glitches in GSTN - Time-limit to avail credit - Delhi High Court in
               Brand Equity case [2020 (38) G.S.T.L. 10 (Del.)] holding that time-limit of 90
               days prescribed in Rule 117 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 not
               mandatory but directory in nature - Directions issued to Authorities to publi-
               cise said judgment including by uploading it on their website so that all as-
               sessees, who were unable to upload Form/GST Trans-1, could do so on or be-
               fore  30th June,  2020, not complied with  - Decision not stayed by Supreme
               Court - Authorities under obligation to abide by directions issued therein by
               adequately publicising said decision and uploading it on their website as also
               by opening its common portal to enable the petitioner and all similarly placed
               parties to upload Form GST Trans-1, for claiming Cenvat credit - Direction to
               ensure compliance of said decision by 19-6-2020, particularly since cut of date
               fixed by Court in said case was 30th June, 2020, which would leave only ten
               clear days for petitioner and similarly placed assessees to take necessary steps.
               [paras 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
                                                                     Petition disposed of
                                             CASE CITED
               Brand Equity Treaties Limited v. Union of India
                    — 2020 (38) G.S.T.L. 10 (Del.) — Relied on ......................................................................... [Paras 3, 6, 7]
                                    GST LAW TIMES      13th August 2020      57
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62