Page 140 - GSTL_20th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 3
P. 140

354                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 39
                                              2020 (39) G.S.T.L. 354 (A.A.R. - GST - A.P.)

                                         BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING UNDER GST,
                                                               ANDHRA PRADESH
                                             S/Shri D. Ramesh, Member (State Tax) and M. Sreekanth,
                                                              Member (Central Tax)
                                                   IN RE : DKV ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.
                                                      AAR No. 04/AP/GST/2020, dated 24-2-2020
                                            Export of services - Marketing and Consultancy services to clients out-
                                     side India - Functions required by client carried out in India and payment re-
                                     ceived in convertible foreign exchange - Assessee by providing marketing and
                                     consultancy services facilitating supply of goods, i.e., fluid cracking catalysts
                                     and its additives from its foreign client to its clients in India - Transaction not
                                     done on its own account - Assessee an “intermediary”- Receipt of payment in
                                     foreign exchange not to qualify transaction as export of services - IGST was
                                     payable on  such transaction - Sections 2(6), 2(13)  and  7(5)(c) of  Integrated
                                     Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. [para 6]
                                                                                Ruling in favour of department
                                            REPRESENTED BY :      Shri S. Chakra Ramana, Authorized Representative,
                                                                  for the Assessee.
                                            [Order]. - The present application has been filed u/s. 97 of the Central
                                     Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (herein-
                                     after referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. DKV Enterpris-
                                     es Private  Limited (hereinafter  referred  to as applicant),  registered under  the
                                     Goods & Services Tax.
                                            2.  The provisions of the CGST Act and APGST Act are identical, except
                                     for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a specific mention of the dissimilar pro-
                                     vision is made, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the
                                     same provision under the APGST Act. Further, henceforth, for the purposes of
                                     this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision under the CGST or
                                     APGST Act would be mentioned as being under the GST Act.
                                            3.  Brief facts of the case :
                                            M/s. DKV Enterprises Private Limited, Visakhapatnam (hereinafter ap-
                                     plicant) is an authorized non-exclusive consultant for Grace Products (Singapore)
                                     Pte. Limited for the sale of Fluid Cracking Catalysts and Additives.
                                            Grace Davison is a business unit of W.R. Grace (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., a
                                     Singapore corporation (hereafter “Grace”), with its principal place of business at
                                     501  Orchard  Road, #07-02 Wheelock place, Singapore 238880 and  it engaged
                                     DKV Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., as its authorized non-exclusive consultant for sale of
                                     its products to the HPCL Visakha Refinery, the CPCL Chennai Refinery and the
                                     IOCL Barauni Refinery (hereinafter the “Territory”) reserving unto itself and its
                                     affiliates the right to sell the products directly in the territory or through other
                                     consultants and distributors.
                                            The applicant claims that only marketing consultancy service  is being
                                     done by them in India on behalf of foreign company and their billing is directly
                                     done to foreign company  in foreign currency and paid by  inward remittance.
                                     More over it is argued that they are neither giving any service to Indian client
                                     nor having any agreement or payment to them. In light of the above the appli-
                                                         GST LAW TIMES      20th August 2020      140
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145