Page 16 - GSTL_20th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 3
P. 16
xiv GST LAW TIMES [ Vol. 39
Rate of GST (Contd.)
— Ongoing business transferred in full on consideration - See under
TRANSFER ..................................... 334
REFUND/REFUND CLAIM :
— of accumulated Cenvat credit - Export of service - Registration, necessity
of - Issue no longer res integra having been decided by this High Court in
cases reported at 2018-TIOL-1126-HC-MAD-ST and 2017 (3) G.S.T.L. 45
(Mad.) holding that registration of assessee was not required for grant of
refund aforesaid - Thus, even though assessee was not registered with
Service Tax Department at relevant time, impugned order of Tribunal
which has followed law laid down above, sustainable - Rule 5 of Cenvat
Credit Rules, 2004 — Commissioner of GST & C. Ex., Chennai v. Pay Pal India Pvt. Ltd.
(Mad.) ......................................... 261
— of excess GST paid, AAR has no jurisdiction to issue directions - See
under ADVANCE RULING ............................ 349
Registration under GST - Cancellation thereof - Revocation of cancellation -
Application for restoration of cancelled registration filed much beyond 30
days resulting in dismissal of appeal - In view of Central Goods and
Services Tax (Removal of Difficulties Order), 2020 issued on 25-6-2020,
where-under relaxation has been given by extending date for filing
application for revocation of cancelled registration upto 31-8-2020,
impugned orders of Assessing as well as First Appellate Authority set
aside - Application dated 19-10-2019 filed for revocation of registration
cancellation order dated 19-1-2019 restored and to be decided within 15
days in accordance with law - Section 30 of Central Goods and Services
Tax Act, 2017/Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Article
226 of Constitution of India — Versatile Construction v. State of Uttar Pradesh (All.) ... 259
— under Service Tax law not necessary for refund of accumulated Cenvat
Credit on export of services - See under REFUND/REFUND CLAIM ..... 261
Reimbursement towards Lost in Hole/Damage beyond Repair of
equipment/tool - Reimbursement of LIH equipment/tools entirely
different from liquidated damages/compensation for any breach of
contract (including delay) as agreed upon between parties -
Equipment/tools are tangible and movable - Amount of reimbursement
of equipment/tools which damaged beyond repair or loss at an agreed
depreciated value of original FoB price of such equipment/tools - Going
by methodology and by nature of equipment/tools, activity of
reimbursement towards lost in hole/damage beyond repair of
equipment/tools rightly classifiable as ‘Supply of Goods’ - Depending
upon nature of actual goods involved in subject activity and classification
to be in accordance with HSN notified for goods and Classification Rules
made in this regard - Provisions relating to chargeability and levy of GST
under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Rules made
thereunder as applicable to supply of goods will apply - Section 7 of
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — In Re : Halliburton Offshore Services
Inc. (LIH) (A.A.R. - GST - A.P.) .............................. 275
Removal of defects in writ petition when postponed due to COVID-19 - See
under WRIT PETITION ............................... 259
Renting for commercial purposes - Considering the number of rooms and
amenities provided in it, boarding and hospitality services extended to
the inmates and all the clauses of the lease agreements, the building
GST LAW TIMES 20th August 2020 16

