Page 97 - GSTL_20th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 3
P. 97

2020 ]                      IN RE : MASTER MINDS                     311
               Trutuf Safety Glass Industries v. Commissioner of Sales Tax
                    — 2007 (215) E.L.T. 14 (S.C.) — Referred ................................................................................. [Para 4.12]
                              DEPARTMENTAL CLARIFICATIONS CITED
               C.B.I. & C. Circular No. 32/06/2018-GST, dated 12-2-2018 .................................................... [Paras 5.2, 8.8]
               C.B.I. & C. Circular No. 85/04/2019-GST, dated 1-1-2019 .................................................... [Paras 4.32, 8.7]
                       REPRESENTED BY :     Shri Y. Sreenivasa Reddy, Advocate, for the Assessee.
                       [Order]. - The present application has been filed u/s. 97 of the Central
               Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (herein-
               after referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. Master Minds,
               Brodipet, Guntur (hereinafter referred to as ‘applicant’), not registered under the
               Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017.
                       2.  The provisions of the CGST Act and APGST Act are identical, except
               for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a specific mention of the dissimilar pro-
               vision is made, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the
               same provision under the APGST Act. Further, henceforth, for the purposes of
               this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision under the CGST or
               APGST Act would be mentioned as being under the GST Act.
                       3.  Brief facts of the case :
                       3.1  The applicant herein is a proprietary firm and a leading educational
               institution providing coaching to students for Chartered Accountancy certificate
               (‘CA’); Cost and Works Accountancy Certificate (‘ICWA’) and Intermediate Cer-
               tificate. The coaching provided by the applicant enables the students to appear
               for the examinations conducted by the respective statutory bodies i.e., Interme-
               diate (Higher Secondary Education), Chartered Accountancy Course (consisting
               of three levels i.e. CA  Foundation  Course (earlier referred  as ‘CPT’), CA-
               Intermediate (earlier referred as ‘IPCC’) Course and CA-Final Course), and Cost
               Management Accountancy (Consisting of three  levels  i.e. CMA Foundation
               Course, CMA-Intermediate Course  and  CMA-Final Course)  and to obtain the
               necessary qualifications. The applicant’s registration with Service tax department
               was migrated to GST under GST Act w.e.f. 1-7-2017. However, on the request of
               the applicant on the ground that the educational services provided by the appli-
               cant were exempted under GST vide Entry No. 66 of Notification No. 12/2017-
               Central Tax, dated 28-6-2017, the department approved cancellation of Migrated
               Registration.
                       3.2  The applicant was  initially registered with the  service tax depart-
               ment as a service provider under the category of ‘Commercial Training or Coach-
               ing Centre’ and was paying service tax. However, when exemption was provid-
               ed to the services of a Commercial Training or Coaching centre by way of coach-
               ing that  leads to  any certificate recognized by  law under  Notification  No.
               33/2011-S.T., dated 25-4-2011, he stopped payment of service tax on due intima-
               tion to the service tax department.
                       3.3  The service tax department issued show cause notices demanding
               service tax on the fee collected by the applicant  and certain  demands were
               dropped and some confirmed with the reasons detailed below, as can be seen
               from the copies of the show cause notices and orders submitted by the applicant
               along with his application :
                       (a)  The demands in respect of the coaching provided for obtaining cer-
                           tificates of CA-Final, CA-Inter (IPCC) and ICWA Final are not sus-
                           tainable since the coaching provided for these courses lead to grant
                                    GST LAW TIMES      20th August 2020      97
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102