Page 166 - GSTL_27th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 4
P. 166

484                           GST LAW TIMES                      [ Vol. 39
                                     Advance Ruling Authority (Contd.)
                                        from Gujarat, AAR Maharashtra  has no territorial jurisdiction to
                                        pronounce ruling as AAR is constituted State-wise - Notification issued
                                        by State of Maharashtra is applicable only within State for supplies from
                                        Maharashtra - Application not maintainable - Sections 95 and 96 of
                                        Central Goods and Services Tax Act,  2017 - Sections 95 and 96 of
                                        Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — In Re : Apar Industries Ltd.
                                        (A.A.R. - GST - Mah.) .................................. 403
                                     — Territorial jurisdiction - Cause of Action - Applicant’s pleading that since
                                        major cause of action is in State of Maharashtra, AAR Maharashtra can
                                        give ruling in terms of analogue CPC provisions relating to jurisdiction -
                                        This plea not acceptable as major cause of action is taking place in
                                        Gujarat as taxability has arisen there, supply would be from there,
                                        documentation  would be from  there - GST Act being special law,
                                        provisions of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 cannot be made applicable
                                        unless specifically mentioned - Sections 95 and 96 of Central Goods and
                                        Services Tax  Act, 2017 - Sections 95 and 96  of  Maharashtra Goods  and
                                        Services Tax Act, 2017 — In Re : Apar Industries Ltd. (A.A.R. - GST - Mah.) ....... 403
                                     —  Territorial  jurisdiction, scope of - GST law requires tax to be paid by
                                        person making supplies - Therefore for deciding territorial jurisdiction of
                                        AAR, it is place of supply which is relevant - It is not open for AAR in
                                        any State to overstep their jurisdiction and pass rulings on applications
                                        made by persons who are  not undertaking or proposing to undertake
                                        supply in respect of which queries are  made -  Sections  95  and  96  of
                                        Central Goods and Services Tax Act,  2017 - Sections 95 and 96 of
                                        Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — In Re : Apar Industries Ltd.
                                        (A.A.R. - GST - Mah.) .................................. 403
                                     Advertising material  printed as per customer content and specification is
                                        supply of goods - See under PRINTING AND SUPPLY ............. 234
                                     Agent’s supply of services abroad on behalf of Principal located in India is
                                        not export of services - See under CONSULTANCY SERVICES  ........  32
                                     Alcobased hand sanitizers, classification and exemption admissibility - See
                                        under HAND SANITIZER  ............................. 296
                                     Alternative remedy  available, writ jurisdiction not exercised - See under
                                        WRIT JURISDICTION  ............................... 263
                                     —  existing, writ jurisdiction not maintainable - See under WRIT
                                        JURISDICTION ................................... 137
                                     Amount payable under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme,
                                        2019, quantification of - See under SABKA VISHWAS (LEGACY
                                        DISPUTE RESOLUTION) SCHEME, 2019 ..................... 393
                                     ANDHRA PRADESH GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 :
                                     — Schedule-II - Serial No. 6(a) - See under CONSTRUCTION ........... 366
                                     — Section 2(119) - See under CONSTRUCTION ................... 366
                                     Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. (APIIC)
                                        covered under the definition of ‘Government Entity’ - See under
                                        GOVERNMENT ENTITY ...........................  349, 366
                                     Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Engineering Department (APPRED)
                                        qualifies as Government under GST law - See under PURE SERVICES  .... 155
                                                         GST LAW TIMES      27th August 2020      166
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171