Page 175 - GSTL_27th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 4
P. 175

2020 ]                        SUBJECT INDEX                          493
                  definition in Section 2(93)(a) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
                  - Merely  because, applicant having e-mail  correspondence with the
                  employees of clients of Doyen not means that he is ‘carrying on the
                  business of supply of services’ on behalf of Doyen, as is required as per
                  definition of ‘agent’ in Section 2(5) ibid - Such services being supplied for
                  a consultancy fee, is a supply of services as per Para 5 of Schedule II read
                  with Section 7(1)(a) ibid - Applicant liable to pay GST at appropriate rates
                  on the supply of consultancy services to Doyen — In Re : Rajesh Rama Varma
                  (A.A.R. - GST - T.N.) ................................... 32
               Consulting services provided abroad to client of principal located in India,
                  GST leviable as it is not export of services - See under CONSULTANCY
                  SERVICES ....................................... 32
               Consumer Welfare Fund - Scope of refund - Court cannot direct refund of
                  amount to unidentifiable customers/consumers - Article 226 of
                  Constitution of India — Binty v. Union of India (Del.) .................  132
               — under Indirect Taxation - Scope of utilization - Applicability of utilization
                  guidelines to amounts lying unclaimed with Banks/Insurance
                  Companies, etc. - Said Fund, created under various indirect taxation laws
                  with rules framed from time to time for utilization of amount, is used for
                  giving financial assistance to various Universities, Voluntary Consumer
                  Organization  (VCOs) and States to promote and protect welfare and
                  interests of consumers, create consumer awareness  and strengthen
                  consumer movement - Thus, Government is fully aware of scope of
                  utilization  of amount - Accordingly,  petitioners plea of giving same
                  treatment to unutilized and unclaimed amounts lying with Cooperative
                  Banks, Insurance Companies, etc is without any  basis as it  is  not
                  established that said amounts lying with them are in jeopardy - Secondly
                  Banks, Insurance companies, etc. are regulated by their own set of rules
                  and regulatory authorities, e.g.,  RBI/IRDA - These amounts are duly
                  accounted for in books of accounts and utilized as per set norms under
                  proper Audit - Petitioner’s plea of misuse of such funds not well founded
                  for Court to  give directions as desired  by petitioner  - Article 226  of
                  Constitution of India — Binty v. Union of India (Del.) .................  132
               Consumer Welfare Fund Bill, 2010 - See under WRIT JURISDICTION ......  132
               Consumer Welfare Fund Rules, 2010 - See under WRIT JURISDICTION .....  132
               Co-operative Society, taxability of maintenance charges - See under
                  MAINTENANCE CHARGES  ...........................  206
               Copies of documents seized under GST law, scope of supply thereof - See
                  under DOCUMENTS ................................  141
               Court cannot assume role of legislature to convert a proposed Bill into Law
                  notwithstanding pendency of Bill with legislature for quite some time -
                  See under WRIT JURISDICTION  .........................  132
               — cannot direct refund of amount to unidentifiable customers/consumers -
                  See under CONSUMER WELFARE FUND ....................  132
               Covers of Pillow, Latex Block, Mattresses - Product not being plain fabrics
                  but covers for pillow, latex block and mattress, which are made as per
                  specifications of the customers, classification under  Heading 6006 of
                  Customs Tariff Act, 1975 ruled out - Classifiable as ‘Other made up
                                    GST LAW TIMES      27th August 2020      175
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180