Page 23 - GSTL_27th August 2020_Vol 39_Part 4
P. 23

2020 ]    LEGISLATIVE COMPETENCE OF RULES 36(4) AND 86A OF CGST RULES, 2017   J79
                       Further Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017 has conferred the power on
               the Commissioner to deprive the assessee from utilizing the credit available in
               the Electronic Credit Ledger having reasons to believe that credit has been
               fraudulently availed or ineligible credit has been availed.
                       In view of the above
                       (a)  Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules has created new conditions for avail-
                           ing the credit and
                       (b)  Rule 86A has deprived the assessee to utilize the credit of the input
                           tax which is the property of the assessee.
               Delegated Legislation
                       Rules 86A and 36(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017 are Delegated Legislation.
                       Delegated legislation permitted by enabling Acts appears under different
               names. ‘Rule’ and ‘Order’ are by far most common names under which delegat-
               ed legislation is permitted.
                       Regulation may be made as a rule and then it partake the character of a
               Rule.
                       It is observed that the above Rules 86A and 36(4) are independent. There
               is no provisions in the enabling Act (CGST Act, 2017) which restricts the credit to
               avail and which impose restriction to utilize the credit once credited is credited
               to Electronic Credit Ledger.
               Rules to be in conformity with the enabling Act
                       The power to make subordinate legislation is derived from the Enabling
               Act and it is fundamental that the delegate on whom such power is conferred has
               to act within the limits of authority conferred by the Act - Hukamchand v. Union of
               India, AIR 1972 SC 2427.
                       Rules cannot be made to supplant the provisions of the enabling Act but
               to supplement it - St. Johns Teachers Training Institute v. Regional Director, (2003) 3
               SCC 451.
               Benefit of doubt in favour of the constitutional validity
                       In considering the vires of subordinate legislation one should start with
               presumption that it is intra vires. The principle means that if subordinate legisla-
               tion under consideration is open to two constructions, one of which would make
               it bad and other good, the Courts must adopt that construction which makes it
               goods. - St. Johns Teachers Training Institute v. Regional Director, (2003) 3 SCC 451.
               General power by the enabling Act to make Rules is not to extend scope of Act
                       Rules 86A and 36(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017 has extended the scope of
               Sections 16, 17 and 18 of the CGST Act, 2017.
                       Restriction to avail the credit is contained in Section 17 and same is ex-
               haustive. Further conditions to avail the credit as given in Sections 16(2), 16(3)
               and 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 are also exhaustive. Once the conditions to avail
               the credit has been complied and the credit of the input tax does not fall within
               the ambit of the restrictive list laid down in Section 17, the assessee should not be
               restricted to utilize the credit which has been done by Rule 86A of the CGST
               Rules, 2017.

                                    GST LAW TIMES      27th August 2020      23
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28