Page 131 - GSTL_3rd September 2020_Vol 40_Part 1
P. 131

2020 ]                 IN RE : JABALPUR HOTELS PVT. LTD.              65

                         2020 (40) G.S.T.L. 65 (A.A.R. - GST - M.P.)
                   BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING UNDER GST,
                                         MADHYA PRADESH
                S/Shri Manoj Kumar Choubey, Member (SGST) and Virendra Kumar Jain,
                                           Member (CGST)
                             IN RE : JABALPUR HOTELS PVT. LTD.

                           Order No. 10/2020, dated 8-6-2020 in Case No. 27/2019
                       Input Tax Credit  - Lift  - Purchased  and installed  in building  which
               would be used as Hotel for providing taxable service - Hotel building being
               immovable  property, any input or  input  service going into  its construction
               shall not be available for availment of input tax credit - Lift part of a building
               and not separate item per se - It has no identity when removed from building
               being customized mechanism for transportation, designed  to suit specific
               building - Upon piece by piece installation, it becomes an integral part of the
               building - Buildings and Civil Structures not be covered under term “Plant” -
               Lift being part of building and thus fell under exclusion from plant and ma-
               chinery - Input tax credit of tax paid on Lifts procured and installed in hotel
               building shall not be available to applicant - Section 17(5)(d) and 17(6) of Cen-
               tral Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. - Intent of the legislature is clear to the extent
               that it intends to restrict input tax credit on any goods or services which are used or in-
               tended to be used in construction of an immovable property, even when such goods or
               services or both are used in the course of furtherance of business. Any goods or services
               used in construction of an immovable property shall not qualify for availment of input
               tax credit in terms of this Section 17(5) - A lift comprises of components or parts (goods)
               like lift car motors, ropes, rails, etc. and each of them has its own identity prior to instal-
               lation and they are assembled/installed to create the working mechanism called lift. The
               installation of these components/parts  with immense skill is rendition of service and
               without installation in the building, there is no lift. Lifts are assembled and manufac-
               tured to suit the requirement in a particular building and are not something sold out of
               shelf and in fact, the value of goods and the cost of the components used in the manufac-
               turing and installation of a lift are subject to taxation while the element of labour and
               service involved cannot be treated as goods. Parts of the lift are assembled at the site in
               accordance with its design and requirement of the building which may include the floor
               levels and the lift  has to open on  different  floors or otherwise depending upon the re-
               quirement. It has to synchronize with the building and each door has to open on the level
               of each floor. Therefore, the lift cannot be said to be separate from a Building. Also, it has
               to be borne in mind that a lift is not an item that is purchased and sold. [paras 7.6, 7.7,
               7.8, 8.1]
                       Precedent -  Advance Authority’s  Ruling  - No precedential value  but
               persuasive value. [para 7.9]
                                                          Ruling in favour of department

                                             CASES CITED
               Commissioner v. Ashok Agencies — 2016 (41) S.T.R. 647 (Tribunal) — Referred ............................ [Para 4]
               Commissioner v. India Cements Ltd. — 2014 (310) E.L.T. 636 (Mad.) — Referred .......................... [Para 4]
               Commissioner v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd.
                    — 2010 (255) E.L.T. 481 (S.C.) — Referred .................................................................................... [Para 4]

                                   GST LAW TIMES      3rd September 2020      147
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136