Page 16 - ELT_1_1st April 2020_Vol 372_Part
P. 16

xiv                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372
                                     DTA clearance by EOU for job work whether amounts to Sale - See under
                                        SALE .........................................  14
                                     — of goods manufactured on basis of job work, scope of - See under EXIM ....  14
                                     — scope of exemption Notification No. 8/97-C.E. - See under EXEMPTION  ...  14
                                     DTA removal of electricity generated in SEZ, exemption not admissible - See
                                        under SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE  .......................  60
                                     Duty paid on exempted  goods amount to reversal  of credit - See under
                                        DEMAND ...................................... 172
                                     Electricity generation in SEZ, exemption not admissible on removal to DTA
                                        - See under SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE  ....................  60
                                     Electricity import  - Country specific exemption  cannot be extended to
                                        import from other countries - See under EXEMPTION   .............  60
                                     Electro Therapeutic Apparatus (Theratron Phoenix Cobalt-60), a medical
                                        equipment, exemption not deniable for violation of post import condition
                                        - See under MEDICAL EQUIPMENT  .......................  88
                                     Encoders, modulators and multiplexer  - Classification - Adjudicating
                                        authority classified the goods under Heading 8517 of Customs Tariff Act,
                                        1975 not under Heading 8528 ibid and set aside the demand for extended
                                        period - Revenue filed appeal only against the issue of setting aside of
                                        demand - HELD : Appeal has already been decided on merits in favour
                                        of assessee by this Tribunal vide Final Order No.  A/12699/2018 so,
                                        appeal filed by Revenue do not sustain and hence dismissed - Customs
                                        Tariff Act, 1975 —  Commr.  of Cus., Ahmedabad  v. Modern  Communication and
                                        Broadcast Systems Pvt. Ltd. (Tri. - Ahmd.) .........................  80
                                     Evidence - Fraudulent availment of Cenvat credit by replacing new material
                                        with bazar scrap, credit not deniable in absence of cogent evidence - See
                                        under CENVAT CREDIT .............................. 129
                                     — Third Party Evidence cannot be relied for alleging clandestine removal -
                                        See under DEMAND  ................................ 129
                                     — Undervaluation of SS Flats, demand not sustainable in absence of cogent
                                        evidence - See under DEMAND .......................... 129
                                     Exemption admissible to Job worker on filing of undertaking by principal
                                        under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. - See under JOB WORK  .......... 172
                                     — DTA clearances  by EOU - Benefit of Notification No. 8/97-C.E. as
                                        amended by Notification No. 21/97-C.E. - Conditions to be fulfilled - (i)
                                        Finished products, rejects and waste or  scrap specified in Schedule to
                                        Central Excise Tariff should be produced or manufactured in 100% EOU
                                        or a free trade zone; (ii)  said finished products to be manufactured
                                        wholly from  raw materials produced  or manufactured in India; (iii)
                                        finished goods allowed to be sold in India under and in accordance with
                                        sub-paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d) and (f) of paragraph 9.9 or of paragraph
                                        9.20 of EXIM Policy, 1997-2002 — Commr. of C. Ex., Nagpur v. Universal Ferro &
                                        Allied Chemicals Ltd. (S.C.) ................................  14
                                     — not admissible on DTA removal of  electricity generated in SEZ - See
                                        under SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE  .......................  60
                                     — on import of electricity - Country specific exemption - General
                                        admissibility - Petitioner cannot take benefit of Notification No. 9/2016-
                                        Cus., as NIL rate of duty prescribed therein is country specific i.e. import
                                        of electricity from Nepal and Bhutan - Article 226 of Constitution of India
                                        — Adani Power Ltd. v. Union of India (Guj.) ........................  60
                                                          EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st April 2020      64
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21