Page 20 - ELT_1_1st April 2020_Vol 372_Part
P. 20

xviii                       EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372
                                     Manufacture - Activity of conversion of unrefined lead ingots into refined
                                        lead ingots to make lead alloys for making batteries - Refined lead means
                                        metal containing by weight at least 99.9% of lead  which is used for
                                        manufacturing of lead acid battery, and so, its use is different from the
                                        use of unrefined lead ingots - In view of the decision by Apex Court in
                                        2015 (319) E.L.T. 578 (S.C.) such an  activity amounts to manufacture,
                                        when a different product comes into existence as a result of a process
                                        which  makes  the said product commercially usable -  Also, in terms of
                                        Notification  No. 96/2009-Cus. said  process amounts  to manufacture as
                                        FTP read with the Import Export Policy, requires to bring a new product
                                        having a distinct name, character and use - Section 2(f) of Central Excise
                                        Act, 1944 — Commr. of C. Ex. & Service Tax, Jammu & Kashmir v. Gravita Metals (Tri. -
                                        Chan.) ......................................... 172
                                     — Blending Motor Spirit (MS) and HSD  with small  quantity of
                                        multifunctional additives to make  branded MS/HSD  - Issue no longer
                                        res integra having been decided in number of cases holding that blending
                                        ibid merely improves  quality of MS/HSD and there was no change in
                                        characteristics, usage and ISI specifications of these products - No stay
                                        has been granted against these decisions  - Case law  relied by Revenue
                                        not applicable as same pertained to exemption notification - Impugned
                                        order not sustainable as activity not amounting to manufacture - Section
                                        2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Commr.
                                        of C. Ex., Patna (Tri. - Kolkata) .............................. 137
                                     — Refilling of imported ink from bulk container to small packs i.e. printing
                                        reservoir and printing ink cartridges procured from third party and re-
                                        labelling such small packs does not amount to manufacture - Section 2(f)
                                        of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Domino Printech India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commr. of C. Ex.,
                                        Delhi-III (Tri. - Chan.) ..................................  96
                                     Manufactured vis-à-vis unmanufactured Tobacco, classification of - See
                                        under TOBACCO POWDER (SNUFF) ....................... 156
                                     Medical Equipment  - Electro Therapeutic Apparatus  (Theratron  Phoenix
                                        Cobalt-60) -  Exemption under Notification No. 64/88-Cus. cannot be
                                        denied for failure to fulfill post import conditions such as production of
                                        installation certificate, free treatment to patients of income less than ` 500
                                        per  month, 10% beds allotted to patients for treatment with the said
                                        equipment, etc. particularly when  all required documents produced at
                                        the time of import and clearance of goods was allowed - Failure to fulfill
                                        post import conditions may lead to confiscation and not disallowance of
                                        exemption —  Keshlata Cancer Hospital Pvt. Ltd. v. Commr. of Cus. (Import), Mumbai
                                        (Tri. - Mumbai) .....................................  88
                                     — Electro Therapeutic Apparatus (Theratron Phoenix Cobalt-60) imported
                                        under Notification No. 64/88-Cus. - Time-limit for furnishing installation
                                        certificate - No time-limit prescribed in the Notification for production of
                                        such certificate - However, time-limit for its production can be specified
                                        by Assistant  Collector of  Customs at the time of import - Department
                                        having failed to specify such period at the time of import and also in the
                                        show cause notice issued after 8 years of import, asking for production of
                                        said certificate after such a lapse of time not justified particularly when
                                        DGHS  withdrawn duty exemption certificate after three months of
                                        issuance of the said show cause notice — Keshlata Cancer Hospital Pvt. Ltd. v.
                                        Commr. of Cus. (Import), Mumbai (Tri. - Mumbai) ......................  88
                                                          EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st April 2020      68
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25