Page 22 - ELT_1_1st April 2020_Vol 372_Part
P. 22

xx                          EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372
                                     Recovery proceedings  against refund on finalization of  provisional
                                        assessment, demand without review of assessment order not sustainable
                                        - See under DEMAND  ...............................  30
                                     Refilling of  imported ink  from  bulk container to small packs and re-
                                        labelling such small packs  not amounting to manufacture - See under
                                        MANUFACTURE ..................................  96
                                     Refined Vegetable oil  - Fatty acid arising during  manufacture of  refined
                                        vegetable oil, exemption admissible, it being waste - See under WASTE .... 142
                                     REFUND/REFUND CLAIM :
                                     — Cenvat credit lying  unutilized  in books  of  account of tobacco
                                        manufacturer who closed his business and surrendered Central Excise
                                        registration, liable to be refunded in cash - Contention of Revenue that
                                        provisions of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 not applicable in respect  of
                                        tobacco manufacturers  working  under Chewing Tobacco and
                                        Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machine (Capacity Determination and
                                        Collection of Duty) Rules, 2010, not acceptable - Section 11B of Central
                                        Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 — Shree Flavours
                                        Llp v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi (Tri. - Del.) ...................  81
                                     — granted on finalization of provisional assessment, demand of  refund
                                        without review of assessment order  not sustainable - See under
                                        DEMAND ......................................  30
                                     Re-labelling - Ink imported, its refilling from bulk container to small packs
                                        and re-labelling such small packs not amounting to  manufacture - See
                                        under MANUFACTURE  ..............................  96
                                     Re-testing of samples denial amounts to violation of natural  justice  -  See
                                        under SAMPLE TESTING  ............................. 145
                                     Returns  mentioning therein activities undertaken, extending period of
                                        limitation not invocable - See under DEMAND  .................  96
                                     Review - Refund granted on finalization of provisional assessment, demand
                                        of refund without review of assessment order not sustainable - See under
                                        DEMAND ......................................  30
                                     Sale - Job work by EOU to DTA units - Transfer of Manganese Ore by DTA
                                        unit to assessee for purposes of processing and conversion  into Silicon
                                        Manganese for valuable consideration - Narrower scope of term ‘sale’ as
                                        found in Sale of Goods Act, 1930 not applicable to such transaction -
                                        Terms ‘sale’ and ‘purchase’ under Central Excise Act, 1944, if construed
                                        literally, it would give a wider scope and also include transfer of
                                        possession for valuable consideration  under definition of term ‘sale -
                                        Section 2(h) of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Commr. of C. Ex., Nagpur v. Universal
                                        Ferro & Allied Chemicals Ltd. (S.C.) ............................  14
                                     Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - See under SALE  ......................  14
                                     Samples  - Testing of samples - Imported  synthetic waste - Sample drawn
                                        post clearance/removal of good under provisional assessment, in terms
                                        of Section 18 of Customs Act, 1962 - HELD : After release of imported
                                        goods from Customs area, authorities not empowered, much less under
                                        Section 144 of Customs Act, 1962, to draw samples at subsequent stage
                                        from factory  premises - Writ petitions deserve to be  allowed —  Raghav
                                        Woollen Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (P & H) ......................  42
                                     Sample testing  - Natural justice - Re-testing of samples when initial test
                                        report inconclusive - Denial of request for re-testing of samples amounts
                                                          EXCISE LAW TIMES      1st April 2020      70
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27