Page 14 - ELT_2nd_15th April 2020_Vol 372_Part
P. 14

xii                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372
                                     Commissioner v. Reliance Media Works Ltd. (Bom.) ................ 220
                                     Commissioner v. Sulakhi Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (Tri. - Mumbai)  ........... 273
                                     Inspector of Police, CBI/SCB v. Asstt. DIR., Directorate of Enforcement
                                        (Ker.) ......................................... 209
                                     J.K. Traders v. Union of India (Pat.) ......................... 237
                                     Jama Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Imports) (S.C.) .... 193
                                     Narendra Kumar Jain v. Dinesh Meena, Joint Commr., Cus. (Preventive)
                                        (Del.) ......................................... 247
                                     Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Union of India (Guj.) .......... 194
                                     Pee Cee Cosma Sope Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur (Tri. -
                                        All.) .......................................... 281
                                     Pinki Agarwal; See Commissioner v. Pinki Agarwal (Tri. - All.) ........... 277
                                     Raju Sharma v. Union of India (Del.) ........................ 249
                                     RBT Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata (Tri. -
                                        Kolkata) ....................................... 257
                                     Reliance Media Works Ltd.; See Commissioner v. Reliance Media Works
                                        Ltd. (Bom.) ...................................... 220
                                     Sharaya International v. Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva-V (Tri. -
                                        Mumbai) ....................................... 297
                                     Skyline Exports v. Deputy Commr. of Cus. (EDI-Drawback), Chennai
                                        (Mad.) ........................................ 254
                                     Sulakhi Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.; See Commissioner v. Sulakhi Chemicals Pvt.
                                        Ltd. (Tri. - Mumbai) ................................. 273
                                     Turakhia Ferromet Pvt. Ltd. v. Commr. of Cus. (Import), Mumbai (Tri. -
                                        Mumbai) ....................................... 279
                                     Vedanta Limited v. Union of India (Bom.) ...................... 206
                                     Zerogravity Aesthetics LLP v. Commissioner of Cus. (Noida), Dadri (Tri. -
                                        All.) .......................................... 303
                                                              SUBJECT INDEX

                                                     [CASE LAW : CUSTOMS, EXCISE & EXIM]
                                     Adjudication  - Reliance of DRI Alert  Circular - Non-furnishing  a copy
                                        thereof - Natural justice - In view of Revenue’s averment that matter if
                                        remanded would be readjudicated on its merits, impugned order set
                                        aside, it being violative of natural justice - Accepting petitioner’s request,
                                        Revenue directed to furnish him a copy of aforesaid Alert Circular within
                                        7 days - Thereafter petitioner shall submit reply to Show Cause Notice
                                        within next seven days and case would be adjudicated by Adjudicating
                                        Authority on its own merits without being influenced by said circular -
                                        Section 122A of Customs Act, 1962 - Article 226 of Constitution of India
                                        — Vedanta Limited v. Union of India (Bom.) ........................ 206
                                     Adjudication proceedings - Methodology - Challenge in Writ proceedings -
                                        Show Cause Notice with regard to seizure of Gold Bars has already been
                                        issued and  adjudication proceedings  have already begin - Thus
                                        petitioner’s challenge for  correction of methodology of adjudication,
                                        cannot be accepted at all - No interference is called for in discretion of
                                        adjudication  authority who is expected to complete adjudication
                                                         EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th April 2020      30
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19