Page 18 - ELT_2nd_15th April 2020_Vol 372_Part
P. 18

xvi                         EXCISE LAW TIMES                    [ Vol. 372
                                     Drawback (Contd.)
                                        Excise Duties and Service  Tax Drawback (Amendment) Rules, 2006 —
                                        Skyline Exports v. Deputy Commr. of Cus. (EDI-Drawback), Chennai (Mad.) .......... 254
                                     — Export  of  leather jackets, allegation  of overvaluation in  order to claim
                                        higher drawback not established - See under VALUATION (CUSTOMS)  ... 257
                                     DRI Alert  Circular’s  reliance in adjudication, scope of - See under
                                        ADJUDICATION .................................. 206
                                     DTA supplier  paying Central Excise duty  on SEZ supplies, refund not
                                        admissible to SEZ unit/developer - See under SPECIAL ECONOMIC
                                        ZONE ........................................ 266
                                     Enhancement of value on basis of contemporary imports of similar goods
                                        from same supplier  by PSU when not sustainable - See under
                                        VALUATION (CUSTOMS) ............................. 279
                                     Evidence - Hot-rolled steel plates (non-alloy) - Contemporary imports by
                                        PSU when not reliable evidence for enhancement  of value - See  under
                                        VALUATION (CUSTOMS) ............................. 279
                                     Excess duty paid on import of machinery as part of turnkey project, refund
                                        not deniable on ground of unjust enrichment - See under
                                        REFUND/REFUND CLAIM ............................ 194
                                     Excisability of  goods,  appeal not lying with High Court - See under
                                        APPEAL TO HIGH COURT  ............................ 220
                                     Exemption admissible on manufacture of laundry soap with aid of gas - See
                                        under POWER .................................... 281
                                     Exemption   notification,  scope  of  interpretation  -  See  under
                                        INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES ........................ 281
                                     Export of leather jackets, allegation of overvaluation in order to claim higher
                                        drawback not established - See under VALUATION (CUSTOMS)  ....... 257
                                     Factory Act, 1948 - See under POWER  ........................ 281
                                     Foreign currency  - Scope of redemption on confiscation - See under
                                        REDEMPTION FINE  ................................ 249
                                     Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - See under REDEMPTION FINE ... 249
                                     Gas used in manufacture of laundry soap, exemption admissible - See under
                                        POWER ....................................... 281
                                     Hot-rolled steel plates (non-alloy) - Contemporary imports by  PSU when
                                        not reliable evidence for enhancement of value - See under VALUATION
                                        (CUSTOMS) ..................................... 279
                                     Import of goods at port not authorised for such goods - Transshipment to
                                        authorised port - Beauty and Make-up preparations imported via port
                                        not authorised for import  of such goods - Transshipment of imported
                                        goods to ports where import of such goods allowed - Goods imported by
                                        assessee were not banned goods - Confiscation of the same set aside
                                        along with  redemption fine and penalty - Department to allow
                                        transshipment of said goods from ICD,  Dadri to ICD, Tughlakabad or
                                        ICD, Patparganj suitable to Customs organization at cost borne by
                                        importer -  On transshipment, Customs Authorities to examine subject
                                        goods for clearance to home consumption - Sections 111, 112 and 125 of
                                        Customs Act, 1962 — Zerogravity Aesthetics LLP v. Commissioner of Customs (Noida),
                                        Dadri (Tri. - All.) .................................... 303

                                                         EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th April 2020      34
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23