Page 47 - ELT_2nd_15th April 2020_Vol 372_Part
P. 47

2020 ]         CURATIVE JURISDICTION OF HON’BLE SUPREME COURT        A63

               CURATIVE JURISDICTION OF HON’BLE
               SUPREME COURT

               By
                                 
               Manoj Kumar Jha
               VIGILANCE OFFICER

                       In respect of Review jurisdiction, discussed in
               these columns, it is noteworthy that in the direction dated
               10-2-2020  in Review Petition  (Civil) No.  3358  of 2018 in
               Writ Petition No. 373 of 2006 in Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian
               Young Lawyers  Association thr.  Its  General Secretary Ms.
               Bhakti Pasrija and Ors., it was ordered :
                           “We have heard the parties at length. For reasons to follow, we hold
                       that this Court can refer questions of law to a Larger Bench in a Review Pe-
                       tition.”
                       In  other  words, even in a  Review  Petition, matter  may be referred to
               Larger Bench. Reasons for the same are awaited.
                       Prior to  2002, dismissal of review petition  left the parties without any
               further remedy, however, in the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in  Rupa
               Ashok Hurra v.  Ashok Hurra and Another case discussed  in the  following paras,
               concept of a curative petition was devised to empower a litigant to seek a recon-
               sideration of a matter wherein the review petition  also is  unsuccessful  as has
               been observed in the recent decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, deliv-
               ered by Hon’ble K.M. Joseph, J. on 14th November, 2019 in Yashwant Sinha & Ors.
               v. Central Bureau of Investigation [Review Petition (Crl.) No. 46 of 2019 and Writ
               Petition (Crl.) No. 298 of 2018] [2019 (25) G.S.T.L. 161 (S.C.)] :
                       “38.  The anxiety of this Court that the consideration of rendering justice re-
                       main uppermost in the mind of the Court, has led to the Constitution Bench
                       judgment in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra and Another [(2002) 4 SCC 388].
                       It is in the said case that the concept of a curative petition was devised to em-
                       power a litigant to seek a reconsideration of a matter wherein the review peti-
                       tion also is unsuccessful. Certain steps  have been laid down in this regard
                       which stand incorporated in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 [in Part IV Order
                       XLVIII thereof].”
               In this Context, Curative  Jurisdiction of  Hon’ble Supreme  Court is being dis-
               cussed.
               Statutory provision :
                                     The Supreme Court Rules, 2013
                                             ORDER XLVIII
                                         CURATIVE PETITION
                       I.  Curative Petitions shall be governed by judgment of the Court dated
               10th April, 2002 delivered in the case of  ‘Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra and
               Ors.’ in Writ Petition (C) No. 509 of 1997.
                       2. (1)  The petitioner, in the curative petition, shall aver specifically that
               the grounds mentioned therein had been taken in the Review Petition and that it
               ________________________________________________________________________________
                 The views expressed in this article are the personal views of the author.
                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th April 2020      63
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52