Page 59 - ELT_15th June 2020_VOL 372_Part 6th
P. 59

2020 ]                           TIT-BITS                           A213

               Missing Files at DCGI : CIC seeks action, digitisation
                       The Central Information Commission has raised concerns over lack of
               transparency of Drug Controller General of India,  and asked the Health and
               Family Welfare Ministry to look into complaints about missing files, including a
               critical review of the drugs regulator’s procedures and practices, and take ap-
               propriate action.
                       In its order on a complaint against the failure of DCGI and the Central
               Drugs Standard Control Organisation to share the report of a committee led by
               T.K. Mohapatra on suspicious drug approvals for more than two years, the CIC
               also asked the drug regulatory authorities to provide a certified copy of the said
               report to the complainant within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order.
                       The Commission advised CDSCO “to urgently initiate steps to stream-
               line the process of digitisation of records within the Public Authority so that the
               RTI applications/first appeals are dealt with in a time-bound manner”, said the
               order issued on 26-5-2020. “An important report relating to the review of proce-
               dures and practices followed by CDSCO for granting approval and clinical trials
               on certain drugs went missing from their office that had to be procured from the
               author after receipt of notice of hearing from the commission,” it said, expressing
               concerns over its record keeping methodology.
                        [Source : The Economic Times, New Delhi, dated 30-5-2020]

               PM CARES Fund not a ‘public authority’ under RTI Act,
                    says Prime Minister’s Office

               Opposition parties have questioned need to create the reserve when the PM’s
               National Relief Fund is already in existence
                       Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Office on 29-5-2020 refused to provide
               details about the PM CARES Fund - created to tackle the Covid pandemic — to a
               Right to Information applicant, saying that the reserve was not a “public authori-
               ty” under the RTI Act, according to a Live Law report.
                       A law  student from Bengaluru had  filed  an  RTI application  in April,
               seeking details about the constitution of the Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance
               and Relief in Emergency Situations Fund. The applicant had asked for copies of
               the fund’s trust deed and all Government orders related to its creation and func-
               tioning.
                       “The PM CARES Fund is not a public authority under the ambit of Sec-
               tion 2(h) of  RTI Act, 2005,” the  PMO said in response to the  RTI  application.
               “However, relevant information in respect of the fund may be seen on the web-
               site pmcares.gov.in.”
                       According to  Live Law, no such information is  available on the official
               website.
                       Under the RTI Act, a public authority is an organisation established (a)
               under or by the Constitution (b) by any other law made by Parliament or (c) by a
               notification or order issued by the Government. The definition also covers organ-
               isations financed substantially by the Government and non-governmental organ-
               isations.
                                    EXCISE LAW TIMES      15th June 2020      59
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64